spf-discuss
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: AOL rejecting hosts with no rDNS?

2004-06-25 08:50:38
This kind of rule elimate 80% of spam. Other servers are just half configured systems, so colateral damages are not too mutch big.

/Xavier

Except for webhosting companies who have 1000's of domains on a single IP address. Right?

If such companies are not able to set a PTR to their mail software *and* that does not look at their mail log and mailq why the mail is delayed then the company is brain damaged.

I still think that mail services implies responsability, and such companies doesn't think they are responsible for what they do or sell.

The fact that AOL now require a valid PTR and associated A for mail server that send mail to AOL's MX is IMHO a good thing.

Also, helo / ehlo with a valid hostname should also a good thing to be checked (eg RFC 1912 2.1), personaly I don't want to refuse mail because of that, but spammers and low knowledge "administrators" (sic) never check such important parts.

I know I am a bit strict with RFCs, but they are here, and should be respected for the sake of good exchanges between companies...

I beleive that SPF is a good thing for all of us, but I still cannot find a good SRS forwarder (and that can be virtualised) for postfix... ;(

/xavier

--
Xavier Beaudouin - Unix System Administrator & Projects Leader.
President of Kazar Organization : http://www.kazar.net/
Please visit http://caudium.net/, home of Caudium & Camas projects


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>