Re: Re: AOL to ESPs: Comply with SPF, Or Else

Please fire another note telling them to support Port 587 SMTP Submit 
over SMTP AUTH. Or at least allow their POP before SMTP software's SMTP 
listener to listen on BOTH 25 and 587 (for backwards compatibility.
Better yet, tell me how I can reach them and I will do it too.

-Carl

priyadi(_at_)priyadi(_dot_)net wrote:

> On Saturday 12 June 2004 19:28, Tim Meadowcroft wrote:
>
>  
>
> > Sounds good to me - it's all about getting one or two big parties to add
> > SPF support and telling them that support looks like a "competitive
> > advantage" to their market - that will trigger the other players to add SPF
> > support as "catch up", and you get a nice systemic domino effect. I was
> > suggesting the largest hosting companies (which I think write their own
> > control panels) but persuading the control panel writers themselves may be
> > easier and more effective.
> >
> > or to the leading hosting automation providers
> > - cpanel
> > - ensim
> > - plesk
> >    
> I just fired off an email to each of the above control panel makers asking 
> about future SPF support. I'll forward their answers to this list.
> -------
> Sender Policy Framework: http://spf.pobox.com/
> Archives at http://archives.listbox.com/spf-discuss/current/
> Send us money!  http://spf.pobox.com/donations.html
> To unsubscribe, change your address, or temporarily deactivate your subscription, 
> please go to http://v2.listbox.com/member/?listname=spf-discuss(_at_)v2(_dot_)listbox(_dot_)com
>  
--
Carl Hutzler
Director, AntiSpam Operations
America Online Mail Operations
cdhutzler(_at_)aol(_dot_)com
703.265.5521 work
703.915.6862 cell