RE: FTC: we need sender authentication before "Do Not Spam" can work

> > definition of spam is subjective, and not something that can be
> > written into a law.
> I'm not sure I agree that it has to be subjective, since spam is more about
> behavior than content.  SpamHaus has what I think is a very good working
> definition.  Unfortunately, I can't reach their site right now, so I can't
> provide a link.  
http://www.spamhaus.org/definition.html