I agree with that this "All-in-One" complex evolution is not going to help
SPF. if Meng believes that implementers are going to jump and support all
the baloney that is being considered or put into SPF, well, I think he will
be disappointed.
Meng and SPF can survive if its kept simple. Also I should note I believe
any system that imposes a POST SMTP validation concept is simply less
efficient and thus in the long run it is going to be recognized as
problematic. This alone is probably be the Microsoft Callerid proposal
Achilles heel.
-- Hector
----- Original Message -----
From: "Jonathan Gardner" <jonagard(_at_)amazon(_dot_)com>
To: <spf-discuss(_at_)v2(_dot_)listbox(_dot_)com>
Sent: Friday, June 18, 2004 7:37 PM
Subject: [spf-discuss] Jim Lyon's proposed possible extensions
We can win the XML argument if we stick with authentication, authentication,
authentication, and don't allow anything else. I can see their arguments
falling apart as we approach detailed specifics.