On Fri, Jun 25, 2004 at 07:50:33AM +0200, Ralf Doeblitz wrote:
--On Donnerstag, Juni 24, 2004 07:28:43 -0700 Chris Miller
<ctodd(_at_)netgate(_dot_)net> wrote:
[spf-milter memleak]
Given that this doesn't seem to be causing anyone else problems, I suspect
this is a Perl issue, not an issue with spf-milter. Is anyone else
processing this volume of mail?
We process far fewer mails, so spf-milter does not grow as fast, but I
still can see it growing, apparently without bounds. Fortunately this only
means that I have to restart it about once per month, so it is no show
stopper for us.
I think that if you're processing lots of mail, it makes sense to use
libspf with and a patches sendmail. Now I haven't tried this yet, but
maybe it is a better alternative for the milter anyway.
Koen
--
K.F.J. Martens, Sonologic, http://www.sonologic.nl/
Networking, embedded systems, unix expertise, artificial intelligence.
Public PGP key: http://www.metro.cx/pubkey-gmc.asc
Wondering about the funny attachment your mail program
can't read? Visit http://www.openpgp.org/
-------
Sender Policy Framework: http://spf.pobox.com/
Archives at http://archives.listbox.com/spf-discuss/current/
Send us money! http://spf.pobox.com/donations.html
To unsubscribe, change your address, or temporarily deactivate your
subscription,
please go to
http://v2.listbox.com/member/?listname=spf-discuss(_at_)v2(_dot_)listbox(_dot_)com
pgpPI62JFJvaQ.pgp
Description: PGP signature