Re: XML Poll (Please respond only once)2004-06-01 11:12:07In <005301c447de$91a46b40$cec8d684(_at_)sraq(_dot_)intra> "Guillaume Filion" <gfk(_at_)logidac(_dot_)com> writes: After much tought, I am in favor of the dual syntax. Yes for XML as long as it's possible to use the old SPF syntax too. One of the things that made me change my mind is the perl motto: There's more than one way to do it! For this same reason, would you also be in favor of allowing people to publish using YAML (http://yaml.org), or using UTF32, or using a new RPN style syntax? -wayne
|
|