On Wed, 2004-06-02 at 10:47, administrator(_at_)yellowhead(_dot_)com wrote:
As each "canned" routine attempts to cover more and more possible
scenarios, it grows in complexity and size. HTML rendering is a perfect
example of a "canned" routine that is now large and complex, but is
perfectly suitable for use in a Web browser. Does that mean we should use
it in a messaging system just because it is available? It's not so much
"like trying to put a square peg in a round hole", it's more "like trying
to fit an elephant into a suitcase".
Well illustrated! Now if only the XML monkies in here from repeatedly
pushing the XML buzzer this place would start to look at lot less like
an episode of Celebrity Jeopardy and a lot more like a discussion based
in REALITY.
Cheers,
James
--
James Couzens,
Programmer
-----------------------------------------------------------------
http://libspf.org -- ANSI C Sender Policy Framework library
http://libsrs.org -- ANSI C Sender Rewriting Scheme library
-----------------------------------------------------------------
PGP: http://gpg.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0x6E0396B3
-------
Sender Policy Framework: http://spf.pobox.com/
Archives at http://archives.listbox.com/spf-discuss/current/
To unsubscribe, change your address, or temporarily deactivate your
subscription,
please go to
http://v2.listbox.com/member/?listname=spf-discuss(_at_)v2(_dot_)listbox(_dot_)com
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part