-----Original Message-----
From: owner-spf-discuss(_at_)v2(_dot_)listbox(_dot_)com
[mailto:owner-spf-discuss(_at_)v2(_dot_)listbox(_dot_)com]On Behalf Of Mark
Shewmaker
Sent: Friday, June 25, 2004 5:47 PM
To: spf-discuss(_at_)v2(_dot_)listbox(_dot_)com
Subject: RE: [spf-discuss] Possible New Mechanism Prefix
snip
(Rude side note: You are using an outgoing mail server that you don't
trust. This is a problem that you need to correct.)
No. I trust the mail server to only be used by authorized users. It's the
other users I don't trust.
This is the case for EVERYONE that uses a shared MTA.
I do not have the time or expertise to run my own and it isn't affordable
for me to pay someone else to run an MTA just for me.
If SPF PASS==Not a forgery, then a lot of shared MTA users are going to get
burned because the wizards we have now, don't take this situation into
account. There is a risk associated with asserting PASS and people need to
understand that.
Scott Kitterman