spf-discuss
[Top] [All Lists]

RE: help with reference implementation

2004-06-09 08:33:44
That could be.  I did have both those options enabled.  I guess "best guess" 
turns "none" into "pass" or "neutral" depending on whether or not the IP 
matches?

Thanks,
Philip

-----Original Message-----
From: Michael R. Brumm [mailto:me(_at_)michaelbrumm(_dot_)com]
Sent: Wednesday, June 09, 2004 9:35 AM
To: spf-discuss(_at_)v2(_dot_)listbox(_dot_)com
Subject: RE: [spf-discuss] help with reference implementation


Philip Tucker wrote:
In the testing I've done so far, about half the messages result in a 
response of "neutral" and none have resulted in "none".  This seems 
backwards from what I would expect given the explanations above.

I haven't checked the source code, buy maybe the "best guess" 
option (which uses a default SPF record "a/24 mx/24 ptr" when 
no SPF record is found) is turning "none"s into "neutral"s. 
And perhaps the local policy (trusted-forwarder.org) could do 
this too?

Michael R. Brumm

-------
Sender Policy Framework: http://spf.pobox.com/
Archives at http://archives.listbox.com/spf-discuss/current/
To unsubscribe, change your address, or temporarily 
deactivate your subscription, 
please go to 
http://v2.listbox.com/member/?listname=spf-discuss(_at_)v2(_dot_)listbox(_dot_)com