On Mon, Jul 12, 2004 at 08:50:42PM +0200, Frank Ellermann wrote:
| ...he can have %{o} != %{d}. Here I expected that this could
| be a case of...
|
| | foobox.com has a sender policy "v=spf1 redirect=pobox.com"
|
| ...and %{d} == pobox.com set by the redirection. Now if you
| say that this is unclear my foobox.com idea was dubious, it
| should be (for foobox.com) "v=spf1 include:pobox.com ?all".
|
| IMHO an evaluation of redirect=x should result in %{d} == x,
| just like an evaluation of include:x results in %{d} == x.
Well, it does. :)
| 3 - only because it's syntactically possible I'd still like to
| know what -include:x / ~include:x / ?include:x really do
| if somebody uses it.
if the include returns a match, you get the indicated
result.