SPF Discuss (thread)
(unknown),
Shoaib,
2004/07/29
- Re:, wayne, 2004/07/30
- RE:, Shoaib, 2004/07/30
- mail administrator certification example, John Keown, 2004/07/30
- Re: mail administrator certification example, Paul Howarth, 2004/07/30
- Re: mail administrator certification example, John Keown, 2004/07/30
- Re: mail administrator certification example, Stuart D. Gathman, 2004/07/30
- Re: mail administrator certification example, Roger B.A. Klorese, 2004/07/30
- Re: mail administrator certification example, John Keown, 2004/07/30
- Re: mail administrator certification example, Roger B.A. Klorese, 2004/07/30
- Re: mail administrator certification example, Paul Howarth, 2004/07/30
- Re: mail administrator certification example, John Keown, 2004/07/30
- Re: mail administrator certification example, Paul Howarth, 2004/07/30
- Re: mail administrator certification example, Michel Bouissou, 2004/07/30
- Re: mail administrator certification example, Mark, 2004/07/30
- Re: mail administrator certification example, Paul Howarth, 2004/07/30
- Re: mail administrator certification example, John Keown, 2004/07/30
- Re: mail administrator certification example, Greg Connor, 2004/07/30
- Re: mail administrator certification example, Greg Connor, 2004/07/30
- Re: mail administrator certification example, John Keown, 2004/07/30
- Re: mail administrator certification example, Tim Kennedy, 2004/07/30
- Re: mail administrator certification example, Stuart D. Gathman, 2004/07/30
- mail administrator certification example, Roger Moser, 2004/07/31
- Re: mail administrator certification example, Alan Hodgson, 2004/07/30
- Re: mail administrator certification example, Paul Howarth, 2004/07/30
- Re: mail administrator certification example, Stuart D. Gathman, 2004/07/30
- Re: mail administrator certification example, Ernesto Baschny, 2004/07/30
- Re: mail administrator certification example, David Brodbeck, 2004/07/30
- Re: mail administrator certification example, Stuart D. Gathman, 2004/07/30
- Re: mail administrator certification example, John Keown, 2004/07/30
- Re: mail administrator certification example, Ernesto Baschny, 2004/07/30
- Re: mail administrator certification example, Mark, 2004/07/30
- Re: mail administrator certification example, Andriy G. Tereshchenko, 2004/07/30
- Re: mail administrator certification example, John Keown, 2004/07/30
- Re: mail administrator certification example, Roger B.A. Klorese, 2004/07/30
- Re: mail administrator certification example, John Keown, 2004/07/30
- Re: mail administrator certification example, Roger B.A. Klorese, 2004/07/30
- Re: mail administrator certification example, John Keown, 2004/07/30
- Re: mail administrator certification example, Ernesto Baschny, 2004/07/30
- Re: mail administrator certification example, John Keown, 2004/07/30
- Re: mail administrator certification example, David Brodbeck, 2004/07/30
- Re: mail administrator certification example, John Keown, 2004/07/30
- Re: mail administrator certification example, David Brodbeck, 2004/07/30
- Re: mail administrator certification example, Andriy G. Tereshchenko, 2004/07/31
- Re: mail administrator certification example, Koen Martens, 2004/07/31
- Re: mail administrator certification example, Xavier Beaudouin, 2004/07/31
- Re: mail administrator certification example, Paul Howarth, 2004/07/30
- Re: mail administrator certification example, David Brodbeck, 2004/07/30
- Re: mail administrator certification example, John Keown, 2004/07/30
- Re: mail administrator certification example, Roger B.A. Klorese, 2004/07/30
- Re: mail administrator certification example, Stuart D. Gathman, 2004/07/30
- Re: mail administrator certification example, wayne, 2004/07/30
- Re: mail administrator certification example, David Brodbeck, 2004/07/30
- Re: mail administrator certification example, Paul Howarth, 2004/07/30
Overly broad ip range in spf - think like a spammer,
John Keown,
2004/07/28
- Re: Overly broad ip range in spf - think like a spammer, rogerk, 2004/07/28
- Re: Overly broad ip range in spf - think like a spammer, Daniel Taylor, 2004/07/28
- Re: Overly broad ip range in spf - think like a spammer, rogerk, 2004/07/28
- Re: Overly broad ip range in spf - think like a spammer, Stuart D. Gathman, 2004/07/28
- Re: Overly broad ip range in spf - think like a spammer, rogerk, 2004/07/28
- Re: Overly broad ip range in spf - think like a spammer, Stuart D. Gathman, 2004/07/28
- Re: Overly broad ip range in spf - think like a spammer, rogerk, 2004/07/28
- Re: Overly broad ip range in spf - think like a spammer, Lloyd Zusman, 2004/07/28
- Re: Re: Overly broad ip range in spf - think like a spammer, rogerk, 2004/07/28
- Re: Overly broad ip range in spf - think like a spammer, Lloyd Zusman, 2004/07/28
- Re: Overly broad ip range in spf - think like a spammer, David Brodbeck, 2004/07/28
- Re: Overly broad ip range in spf - think like a spammer, John Keown, 2004/07/28
- Re: Overly broad ip range in spf - think like a spammer, Koen Martens, 2004/07/28
- Re: Overly broad ip range in spf - think like a spammer, rogerk, 2004/07/28
- Re: Overly broad ip range in spf - think like a spammer, Thomas Harold, 2004/07/28
- Re: Overly broad ip range in spf - think like a spammer, rogerk, 2004/07/28
- Re: Overly broad ip range in spf - think like a spammer, David Brodbeck, 2004/07/28
- Re: Overly broad ip range in spf - think like a spammer, Roger B.A. Klorese, 2004/07/28
- Re: Overly broad ip range in spf - think like a spammer, John Keown, 2004/07/28
- Re: Overly broad ip range in spf - think like a spammer, Koen Martens, 2004/07/28
- Re: Overly broad ip range in spf - think like a spammer, Koen Martens, 2004/07/28
- Re: Overly broad ip range in spf - think like a spammer, Paul Howarth, 2004/07/28
- Re: Overly broad ip range in spf - think like a spammer, wayne, 2004/07/28
- Re: Overly broad ip range in spf - think like a spammer, David Brodbeck, 2004/07/28
Envelope Sender X From Header. How are you treating this?,
Rodrigo F Afonso,
2004/07/27
- Re: Envelope Sender X From Header. How are you treating this?, Stuart D. Gathman, 2004/07/27
- Re: Envelope Sender X From Header. How are you treating this?, Rodrigo F Afonso, 2004/07/30
- Re: Envelope Sender X From Header. How are you treating this?, Stuart D. Gathman, 2004/07/30
- Re: Envelope Sender X From Header. How are you treating this?, Rodrigo F Afonso, 2004/07/30
- Re: Envelope Sender X From Header. How are you treating this?, Nico Kadel-Garcia, 2004/07/30
- Re: Envelope Sender X From Header. How are you treating this?, Rodrigo F Afonso, 2004/07/30
- Re: *****SPAM***** Re: Envelope Sender X From Header. How are you treating this?, Nico Kadel-Garcia, 2004/07/30
- Re: Envelope Sender X From Header. How are you treating this?, Stuart D. Gathman, 2004/07/30
- Envelope Sender X From Header. How are you treating this?, Roger Moser, 2004/07/30
- Re: Envelope Sender X From Header. How are you treating this?, Rodrigo F Afonso, 2004/07/30
- Re: Envelope Sender X From Header. How are you treating this?, Greg Connor, 2004/07/30
- Re: Envelope Sender X From Header. How are you treating this?, Rodrigo F Afonso, 2004/07/30
List of Domain Names Registrars that allow add SPF into DNS?,
Josep M.,
2004/07/27
- Re: List of Domain Names Registrars that allow add SPF into DNS?, David Brodbeck, 2004/07/27
- Re: List of Domain Names Registrars that allow add SPF into DNS?, Meng Weng Wong, 2004/07/27
- RE: List of Domain Names Registrars that allow add SPF into DNS?, Scott Kitterman, 2004/07/27
- RE: List of Domain Names Registrars that allow add SPF into DNS?, Scott Kitterman, 2004/07/27
- Re: List of Domain Names Registrars that allow add SPF into DNS?, Arjen de Korte, 2004/07/27
- Re: List of Domain Names Registrars that allow add SPF into DNS?, Thomas Harold, 2004/07/27
- Re: List of Domain Names Registrars that allow add SPF into DNS?, Koen Martens, 2004/07/27
Re: [spf-devel] [POLITICAL INFIGHTING] Difference between spf/spf2 srs/srs2,
wayne,
2004/07/26
- Re: Difference between spf/spf2 srs/srs2, Ben Damm, 2004/07/26
- Re: Re: [spf-devel] [POLITICAL INFIGHTING] Difference between spf/spf2 srs/srs2, Roger Moser, 2004/07/27
- Re: Re: [spf-devel] [POLITICAL INFIGHTING] Difference between spf/spf2 srs/srs2, Meng Weng Wong, 2004/07/27
- Re: Re: [spf-devel] [POLITICAL INFIGHTING] Difference between spf/spf2 srs/srs2, rgreene(_at_)tclme(_dot_)org, 2004/07/27
- Re: Re: [POLITICAL INFIGHTING] Difference between spf/spf2 srs/srs2, James Couzens, 2004/07/27
- RE: Re: [spf-devel] [POLITICAL INFIGHTING] Difference between spf/spf2 srs/srs2, Seth Goodman, 2004/07/27
- RE: Re: [POLITICAL INFIGHTING] Difference between spf/spf2 srs/srs2, James Couzens, 2004/07/27
- Re: Re: [spf-devel] [POLITICAL INFIGHTING] Difference between spf/spf2 srs/srs2, David Sowder, 2004/07/28
- Re: Re: [POLITICAL INFIGHTING] Difference between spf/spf2 srs/srs2, James Couzens, 2004/07/27
- Re: Re: [spf-devel] [POLITICAL INFIGHTING] Difference between spf/spf2 srs/srs2, James Couzens, 2004/07/27
- Re: Re: [spf-devel] [POLITICAL INFIGHTING] Difference between spf/spf2 srs/srs2, Roger B.A. Klorese, 2004/07/27
- Re: Re: [spf-devel] [POLITICAL INFIGHTING] Difference between spf/spf2 srs/srs2, Rob McMahon, 2004/07/29
Military,
G E Scott Knauss,
2004/07/26
- Re: Military, wayne, 2004/07/27
- Re: Military, Meng Weng Wong, 2004/07/27
- Re: Military, Stephane Bortzmeyer, 2004/07/28
- Re: Re: Military, Paul Howarth, 2004/07/28
- Re: Re: Military, Stephane Bortzmeyer, 2004/07/28
- Re: Re: Military, John Keown, 2004/07/28
- Re: Re: Military, Arjen de Korte, 2004/07/28
- Re: Re: Military, Roger B.A. Klorese, 2004/07/28
- Re: Re: Military, John Keown, 2004/07/28
- Re: Re: Military, Chip Mefford, 2004/07/28
- Re: Re: Military, John Keown, 2004/07/28
- Re: Re: Military, David Brodbeck, 2004/07/28
- Re: Re: Military, David Brodbeck, 2004/07/28
- Re: Re: Military, Shevek, 2004/07/28
- Re: Re: Military, Paul Howarth, 2004/07/28
- Re: Re: Military, John Keown, 2004/07/28
- Re: Military, Ernesto Baschny, 2004/07/28
- Re: Re: Military, John Keown, 2004/07/28
- Re: Re: Military, Paul Howarth, 2004/07/28
- Re: Re: Military, John Keown, 2004/07/28
- Re: Re: Military, wayne, 2004/07/28
- Re: Re: Military, John Keown, 2004/07/28
- Re: Re: Military, rogerk, 2004/07/28
- Re: Re: Military, John Keown, 2004/07/28
- Re: Re: Military, rogerk, 2004/07/28
- Re: Re: Military, John Keown, 2004/07/28
- Re: Re: Military, rogerk, 2004/07/28
- Re: Re: Military, Paul Ficinski, 2004/07/28
- Re: Re: Military, rogerk, 2004/07/28
- Re: Re: Military, John Keown, 2004/07/28
- Re: Re: Military, rogerk, 2004/07/28
- Re: Re: Military, John Keown, 2004/07/28
- Re: Re: Military, rogerk, 2004/07/28
- RE: Re: Military, Vivien M., 2004/07/28
- Re: Re: Military, Alan Hodgson, 2004/07/28
- Re: Re: Military, Roger B.A. Klorese, 2004/07/28
- Re: Re: Military, Daniel Taylor, 2004/07/28
- Re: Re: Military, Alan Hodgson, 2004/07/28
- Re: Re: Military, Greg Wooledge, 2004/07/28
- Re: Re: Military, John Keown, 2004/07/28
- Re: Re: Military, David Brodbeck, 2004/07/28
- Re: Re: Military, John Keown, 2004/07/28
- Re: Re: Military, Koen Martens, 2004/07/28
- Re: Re: Military, rogerk, 2004/07/28
- Re: Re: Military, Ralf Doeblitz, 2004/07/29
- Re: Re: Military, Koen Martens, 2004/07/30
- Re: Re: Military, Meng Weng Wong, 2004/07/28
- Re: Re: Military, Koen Martens, 2004/07/28
- Re: Re: Military, David Brodbeck, 2004/07/28
- Re: Re: Military, Koen Martens, 2004/07/28
- Re: Re: Military, rogerk, 2004/07/28
- Re: Re: Military, Ralf Doeblitz, 2004/07/29
- Re: Re: Military, Nico Kadel-Garcia, 2004/07/28
- Re: Re: Military, wayne, 2004/07/28
- Re: Re: Military, Michel Bouissou, 2004/07/28
- Re: Re: Military, John Keown, 2004/07/28
Support for Internationalized Explanations,
Chris Haynes,
2004/07/25
- Re: Support for Internationalized Explanations, Roger Moser, 2004/07/25
- Re: Support for Internationalized Explanations, Ernesto Baschny, 2004/07/25
- Re: Support for Internationalized Explanations, Michel Bouissou, 2004/07/25
- Re: Support for Internationalized Explanations, Ernesto Baschny, 2004/07/25
- Re: Support for Internationalized Explanations, Michel Bouissou, 2004/07/25
- Re: Support for Internationalized Explanations, Michel Bouissou, 2004/07/25
- Re: Support for Internationalized Explanations, william(at)elan.net, 2004/07/25
- Re: Support for Internationalized Explanations, Chris Haynes, 2004/07/26
- Re: Support for Internationalized Explanations, Graham Murray, 2004/07/25
- Re: Support for Internationalized Explanations, Frank Ellermann, 2004/07/25
- Re: Re: Support for Internationalized Explanations, Michel Bouissou, 2004/07/25
- Re: Re: Support for Internationalized Explanations, Michel Bouissou, 2004/07/25
- Re: Re: Support for Internationalized Explanations, Chris Haynes, 2004/07/25
- Re: Re: Support for Internationalized Explanations, Michel Bouissou, 2004/07/25
- Re: Re: Support for Internationalized Explanations, Roger Moser, 2004/07/26
- Re: Re: Support for Internationalized Explanations, Chris Haynes, 2004/07/26
- Re: Re: Support for Internationalized Explanations, Stephane Bortzmeyer, 2004/07/26
- Re: Re: Support for Internationalized Explanations, Michel Bouissou, 2004/07/26
- Re: Re: Support for Internationalized Explanations, Alan Hodgson, 2004/07/26
- Re: Support for Internationalized Explanations, Frank Ellermann, 2004/07/25
- Re: Re: Support for Internationalized Explanations, Koen Martens, 2004/07/26
- Re: Re: Support for Internationalized Explanations, Chris Haynes, 2004/07/25
- Re: Re: Support for Internationalized Explanations, Michel Bouissou, 2004/07/25
- Re: Re: Support for Internationalized Explanations, Chris Haynes, 2004/07/25
- Re: Support for Internationalized Explanations, Frank Ellermann, 2004/07/25
- Re: Re: Support for Internationalized Explanations, Andriy G. Tereshchenko, 2004/07/26
- Re: Re: Support for Internationalized Explanations, Koen Martens, 2004/07/26
- Re: Re: Support for Internationalized Explanations, Chris Haynes, 2004/07/27
- Re: Re: Support for Internationalized Explanations, Koen Martens, 2004/07/27
- Re: Support for Internationalized Explanations, Chris Haynes, 2004/07/27
- Re:Support for Internationalized Explanations, Chris Haynes, 2004/07/26
Fwd: Sender-ID and free software,
Michel Bouissou,
2004/07/24
- Re: Fwd: Sender-ID and free software, Meng Weng Wong, 2004/07/25
- Re: Fwd: Sender-ID and free software, Meng Weng Wong, 2004/07/25
- Re: Fwd: Sender-ID and free software, Meng Weng Wong, 2004/07/26
- RE: Fwd: Sender-ID and free software, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 2004/07/25
- RE: Fwd: Sender-ID and free software, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 2004/07/25
- RE: Fwd: Sender-ID and free software, Paul Iadonisi, 2004/07/25
- RE: Fwd: Sender-ID and free software, David Brodbeck, 2004/07/25
- Re: Fwd: Sender-ID and free software, Graham Murray, 2004/07/26
- RE: Fwd: Sender-ID and free software, Paul Iadonisi, 2004/07/25
- Re: Fwd: Sender-ID and free software, Michel Bouissou, 2004/07/25
- Re: Fwd: Sender-ID and free software, Chuck Mead, 2004/07/26
- RE: Fwd: Sender-ID and free software, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 2004/07/25
Is SPF all that useful?,
Gilbert, Joseph,
2004/07/23
- Re: Is SPF all that useful?, Michel Bouissou, 2004/07/23
- Re: Is SPF all that useful?, Koen Martens, 2004/07/23
- RE: Is SPF all that useful?, Gilbert, Joseph, 2004/07/23
- RE: Is SPF all that useful?, Gilbert, Joseph, 2004/07/23
- RE: Is SPF all that useful?, Gilbert, Joseph, 2004/07/23
- RE: Is SPF all that useful?, Ryan Malayter, 2004/07/27
SPF will solve spam and punish spammers,
Jonathan Gardner,
2004/07/22
- Re: SPF will solve spam and punish spammers, Dotzero, 2004/07/22
- Re: *****SPAM***** SPF will solve spam and punish spammers, Nico Kadel-Garcia, 2004/07/22
- Re: SPF will solve spam and punish spammers, Jef Poskanzer, 2004/07/22
- Re: SPF will solve spam and punish spammers, Jonathan Gardner, 2004/07/23
- Re: SPF will solve spam and punish spammers, Paul Howarth, 2004/07/23
- Re: SPF will solve spam and punish spammers, Daniel Taylor, 2004/07/23
- Re: SPF will solve spam and punish spammers, Paul Howarth, 2004/07/23
- Re: SPF will solve spam and punish spammers, Daniel Taylor, 2004/07/23
- Re: SPF will solve spam and punish spammers, Paul Howarth, 2004/07/23
- Re: SPF will solve spam and punish spammers, Daniel Taylor, 2004/07/23
- Re: SPF will solve spam and punish spammers, Paul Howarth, 2004/07/23
- Re: SPF will solve spam and punish spammers, Daniel Taylor, 2004/07/23
- Re: SPF will solve spam and punish spammers, Michel Bouissou, 2004/07/23
- Re: SPF will solve spam and punish spammers, Daniel Taylor, 2004/07/23
- Re: SPF will solve spam and punish spammers, Michel Bouissou, 2004/07/23
- Re: SPF will solve spam and punish spammers, Daniel Taylor, 2004/07/23
- Re: SPF will solve spam and punish spammers, A.G. Russell IV, 2004/07/24
- Re: SPF will solve spam and punish spammers, Daniel Taylor, 2004/07/24
- Re: SPF will solve spam and punish spammers, Andriy G. Tereshchenko, 2004/07/23
- Re: SPF will solve spam and punish spammers, Daniel Taylor, 2004/07/23
- Re: SPF will solve spam and punish spammers, Jonathan Gardner, 2004/07/23
- Re: SPF will solve spam and punish spammers, Stuart D. Gathman, 2004/07/23
- Re: SPF will solve spam and punish spammers, Paul Howarth, 2004/07/23
- Re: SPF will solve spam and punish spammers, David Brodbeck, 2004/07/23
- RE: SPF will solve spam and punish spammers, John Glube, 2004/07/23
- Re: SPF will solve spam and punish spammers, David Brodbeck, 2004/07/23
- Re: SPF will solve spam and punish spammers, Mark C. Langston, 2004/07/23
- Re: SPF will solve spam and punish spammers, Justin Mason, 2004/07/23
- Re: SPF will solve spam and punish spammers, Mark C. Langston, 2004/07/23
- Re: SPF will solve spam and punish spammers, Jonathan Gardner, 2004/07/23
- Re: SPF will solve spam and punish spammers, Paul Howarth, 2004/07/23
- Re: SPF will solve spam and punish spammers, John Keown, 2004/07/23
- Re: SPF will solve spam and punish spammers, Michel Bouissou, 2004/07/23
- Re: SPF will solve spam and punish spammers, John Keown, 2004/07/23
- Re: SPF will solve spam and punish spammers, Michel Bouissou, 2004/07/23
- Re: SPF will solve spam and punish spammers, John Keown, 2004/07/23
- Re: SPF will solve spam and punish spammers, Michel Bouissou, 2004/07/23
- Re: SPF will solve spam and punish spammers, Andriy G. Tereshchenko, 2004/07/23
- Re: SPF will solve spam and punish spammers, Michel Bouissou, 2004/07/23
- Re: SPF will solve spam and punish spammers, John Keown, 2004/07/23
- Re: SPF will solve spam and punish spammers, Michel Bouissou, 2004/07/23
- Re: SPF will solve spam and punish spammers, David Brodbeck, 2004/07/23
- Re: SPF will solve spam and punish spammers, David Brodbeck, 2004/07/23
- Re: SPF will solve spam and punish spammers, James Couzens, 2004/07/23
- Re: SPF will solve spam and punish spammers, John Keown, 2004/07/23
- Re: SPF will solve spam and punish spammers, Michel Bouissou, 2004/07/23
- Re: SPF will solve spam and punish spammers, Len Conrad, 2004/07/23
- Re: SPF will solve spam and punish spammers, Andriy G. Tereshchenko, 2004/07/23
- Re: SPF will solve spam and punish spammers, Paul Ficinski, 2004/07/23
- Re: *****SPAM***** Re: SPF will solve spam and punish spammers, Nico Kadel-Garcia, 2004/07/23
- Re: SPF will solve spam and punish spammers, Stuart D. Gathman, 2004/07/23
- Re: SPF will solve spam and punish spammers, Michel Bouissou, 2004/07/23
- Re: SPF will solve spam and punish spammers, Stuart D. Gathman, 2004/07/23
- Re: SPF will solve spam and punish spammers, John Keown, 2004/07/23
- Re: SPF will solve spam and punish spammers, Michel Bouissou, 2004/07/23
- Re: SPF will solve spam and punish spammers, Stuart D. Gathman, 2004/07/23
- Re: SPF will solve spam and punish spammers, Mark C. Langston, 2004/07/23
- Re: SPF will solve spam and punish spammers, Meng Weng Wong, 2004/07/23
- Re: SPF will solve spam and punish spammers, Daniel Taylor, 2004/07/24
- Re: SPF will solve spam and punish spammers, Roger B.A. Klorese , 2004/07/23
- Re: SPF will solve spam and punish spammers, A.G. Russell IV, 2004/07/24
- Re: SPF will solve spam and punish spammers, John Keown, 2004/07/24
- Re: SPF will solve spam and punish spammers, Roger B.A. Klorese , 2004/07/24
- Re: SPF will solve spam and punish spammers, John Keown, 2004/07/24
- Re: SPF will solve spam and punish spammers, Roger B.A. Klorese , 2004/07/24
- Re: SPF will solve spam and punish spammers, John Keown, 2004/07/24
- Re: SPF will solve spam and punish spammers, Roger B.A. Klorese , 2004/07/24
- Re: SPF will solve spam and punish spammers, Michel Bouissou, 2004/07/24
- Re: SPF will solve spam and punish spammers, John Keown, 2004/07/24
- Re: SPF will solve spam and punish spammers, Roger B.A. Klorese , 2004/07/24
- Re: SPF will solve spam and punish spammers, John Keown, 2004/07/24
- Re: SPF will solve spam and punish spammers, Roger B.A. Klorese , 2004/07/24
- Re: SPF will solve spam and punish spammers, Graham Murray, 2004/07/24
- Re: SPF will solve spam and punish spammers, Arjen de Korte, 2004/07/24
- Re: SPF will solve spam and punish spammers, Meng Weng Wong, 2004/07/24
- Re: SPF will solve spam and punish spammers, Roger B.A. Klorese , 2004/07/24
- Re: SPF will solve spam and punish spammers, John Keown, 2004/07/24
- Re: SPF will solve spam and punish spammers, John Keown, 2004/07/24
- Re: SPF will solve spam and punish spammers, David Brodbeck, 2004/07/24
- RE: SPF will solve spam and punish spammers, terry, 2004/07/24
- Re: SPF will solve spam and punish spammers, John Keown, 2004/07/24
- Re: SPF will solve spam and punish spammers, Andriy G. Tereshchenko, 2004/07/24
- Re: SPF will solve spam and punish spammers, John Keown, 2004/07/24
- Re: SPF will solve spam and punish spammers, Jonathan Gardner, 2004/07/23
- Re: SPF will solve spam and punish spammers, Andriy G. Tereshchenko, 2004/07/23
- RE: SPF will solve spam and punish spammers, Ryan Malayter, 2004/07/23
- RE: SPF will solve spam and punish spammers, Ryan Malayter, 2004/07/23
- RE: SPF will solve spam and punish spammers, Ryan Malayter, 2004/07/26
Is SPF serving the best interests of the end-user?,
spf,
2004/07/21
- Re: Is SPF serving the best interests of the end-user?, Roger B.A. Klorese , 2004/07/21
- Re: Is SPF serving the best interests of the end-user?, spf, 2004/07/21
- Re: Is SPF serving the best interests of the end-user?, Roger B.A. Klorese , 2004/07/21
- Re: Is SPF serving the best interests of the end-user?, spf, 2004/07/21
- Re: Is SPF serving the best interests of the end-user?, Roger B.A. Klorese , 2004/07/21
- Re: Is SPF serving the best interests of the end-user?, spf, 2004/07/21
- Re: Is SPF serving the best interests of the end-user?, David Brodbeck, 2004/07/21
- Re: Is SPF serving the best interests of the end-user?, spf, 2004/07/21
- Re: Is SPF serving the best interests of the end-user?, Graham Murray, 2004/07/21
- Re: Is SPF serving the best interests of the end-user?, Paul Ficinski, 2004/07/22
- Re: Is SPF serving the best interests of the end-user?, spf, 2004/07/22
- Re: Is SPF serving the best interests of the end-user?, Jonathan Gardner, 2004/07/22
- RE: Is SPF serving the best interests of the end-user?, terry, 2004/07/22
- Re: Is SPF serving the best interests of the end-user?, spf, 2004/07/22
- Re: Is SPF serving the best interests of the end-user?, Roger B.A. Klorese , 2004/07/22
- Re: Is SPF serving the best interests of the end-user?, Jonathan Gardner, 2004/07/23
- Re: Is SPF serving the best interests of the end-user?, David Brodbeck, 2004/07/23
- Re: Is SPF serving the best interests of the end-user?, Jonathan Gardner, 2004/07/23
- Moderate or die?, Chris Drake, 2004/07/23
- Re: Moderate or die?, Meng Weng Wong, 2004/07/23
- Re: Is SPF serving the best interests of the end-user?, Len Conrad, 2004/07/21
- Re: Is SPF serving the best interests of the end-user?, Stuart D. Gathman, 2004/07/21
- Re: Is SPF serving the best interests of the end-user?, spf, 2004/07/21
- Re: Is SPF serving the best interests of the end-user?, spf, 2004/07/21
- Re: Is SPF serving the best interests of the end-user?, Daniel Taylor, 2004/07/22
- Re: Is SPF serving the best interests of the end-user?, Meng Weng Wong, 2004/07/22
- Re: Is SPF serving the best interests of the end-user?, spf, 2004/07/22
- Re: Is SPF serving the best interests of the end-user?, Meng Weng Wong, 2004/07/22
- Re: Is SPF serving the best interests of the end-user?, spf, 2004/07/22
- Re: Is SPF serving the best interests of the end-user?, Stuart D. Gathman, 2004/07/23
- Re: Is SPF serving the best interests of the end-user?, Lloyd Zusman, 2004/07/23
SPF and Responsibility,
Jonathan Gardner,
2004/07/19
- Re: SPF and Responsibility, Paul Howarth, 2004/07/20
- Re: SPF and Responsibility, Jonathan Gardner, 2004/07/20
- Re: SPF and Responsibility, Paul Howarth, 2004/07/21
- Re: SPF and Responsibility, Jonathan Gardner, 2004/07/21
- Re: SPF and Responsibility, Michel Bouissou, 2004/07/21
- Re: SPF and Responsibility, Daniel Taylor, 2004/07/21
- RE: SPF and Responsibility, terry, 2004/07/21
- Re: SPF and Responsibility, Daniel Taylor, 2004/07/21
- Re: SPF and Responsibility, Andriy G. Tereshchenko, 2004/07/21
- Re: SPF and Responsibility, David Brodbeck, 2004/07/21
- Re: SPF and Responsibility, Andriy G. Tereshchenko, 2004/07/21
- Re: [O.T] [Was: SPF and Responsibility], Michel Bouissou, 2004/07/21
- Re: SPF and Responsibility, David Brodbeck, 2004/07/21
- Re: *****SPAM***** Re: SPF and Responsibility, Nico Kadel-Garcia, 2004/07/22
- Re: SPF and Responsibility, Michel Bouissou, 2004/07/21
- Re: SPF and Responsibility, Jonathan Gardner, 2004/07/21
- Re: SPF and Responsibility, Stuart D. Gathman, 2004/07/21
- Re: SPF and Responsibility, Andriy G. Tereshchenko, 2004/07/21
- Re: SPF and Responsibility, Michel Bouissou, 2004/07/21
- RE: SPF and Responsibility, Stuart D. Gathman, 2004/07/21
- RE: SPF and Responsibility, Stuart D. Gathman, 2004/07/21
- Re: SPF and Responsibility, Graham Murray, 2004/07/21
- Re: SPF and Responsibility, Jonathan Gardner, 2004/07/21
- Re: SPF and Responsibility, Michel Bouissou, 2004/07/21
- Re: SPF and Responsibility, mhammer, 2004/07/21
- Re: SPF and Responsibility, Michel Bouissou, 2004/07/21
- Re: SPF and Responsibility, Mark Shewmaker, 2004/07/21
- Re: SPF and Responsibility, Jonathan Gardner, 2004/07/21
- Re: SPF and Responsibility, Michel Bouissou, 2004/07/21
- Re: SPF and Responsibility, Mark Shewmaker, 2004/07/21
- Re: SPF and Responsibility, Stuart D. Gathman, 2004/07/21
- Re: SPF and Responsibility, David Beveridge, 2004/07/21
- Re: SPF and Responsibility, Mark Shewmaker, 2004/07/21
- Re: SPF and Responsibility, David Beveridge, 2004/07/21
- Re: SPF and Responsibility, Mark Shewmaker, 2004/07/21
- Re: SPF and Responsibility, David Beveridge, 2004/07/22
- Re: SPF and Responsibility, Mark Shewmaker, 2004/07/22
- Re: SPF and Responsibility, Michel Bouissou, 2004/07/22
- Re: SPF and Responsibility, Mark Shewmaker, 2004/07/22
- RE: SPF and Responsibility, terry, 2004/07/22
- RE: SPF and Responsibility, Mark Shewmaker, 2004/07/22
- RE: SPF and Responsibility, terry, 2004/07/22
- Re: SPF and Responsibility, Daniel Taylor, 2004/07/22
- RE: SPF and Responsibility, terry, 2004/07/22
- RE: SPF and Responsibility, Mark Shewmaker, 2004/07/22
- Re: SPF and Responsibility, Andriy G. Tereshchenko, 2004/07/22
- Re: SPF and Responsibility, Mark Shewmaker, 2004/07/22
- Re: SPF and Responsibility, Greg Wooledge, 2004/07/22
- Re: SPF and Responsibility, Daniel Taylor, 2004/07/22
- Re: SPF and Responsibility, Michel Bouissou, 2004/07/22
- Re: SPF and Responsibility, Daniel Taylor, 2004/07/22
- Re: SPF and Responsibility, Michel Bouissou, 2004/07/22
- Re: SPF and Responsibility, Daniel Taylor, 2004/07/22
- Re: SPF and Responsibility, Michel Bouissou, 2004/07/22
- Re: SPF and Responsibility, Daniel Taylor, 2004/07/22
- Re: SPF and Responsibility, Stuart D. Gathman, 2004/07/22
- Re: SPF and Responsibility, Michel Bouissou, 2004/07/22
- Re: SPF and Responsibility, Stuart D. Gathman, 2004/07/22
- RE: SPF and Responsibility, terry, 2004/07/22
- Re: SPF and Responsibility, Daniel Taylor, 2004/07/22
- RE: SPF and Responsibility, terry, 2004/07/22
- Re: SPF and Responsibility, Daniel Taylor, 2004/07/22
- Re: SPF and Responsibility, Jonathan Gardner, 2004/07/22
- Re: *****SPAM***** Re: SPF and Responsibility, Nico Kadel-Garcia, 2004/07/22
- Re: SPF and Responsibility, Mark Shewmaker, 2004/07/22
- Re: SPF and Responsibility, David Sowder, 2004/07/22
- Re: SPF and Responsibility, Stuart D. Gathman, 2004/07/22
- Re: SPF and Responsibility, David Sowder, 2004/07/22
- RE: SPF and Responsibility, terry, 2004/07/22
- Re: SPF and Responsibility, Thomas Harold, 2004/07/23
- Re: SPF and Responsibility, David Brodbeck, 2004/07/22
- Re: SPF and Responsibility, Mark Shewmaker, 2004/07/22
- Re: SPF and Responsibility, Stuart D. Gathman, 2004/07/22
- Re: SPF and Responsibility, David Brodbeck, 2004/07/22
- Re: SPF and Responsibility, Chris Haynes, 2004/07/22
- Re: SPF and Responsibility, David Brodbeck, 2004/07/22
- Re: SPF and Responsibility, Mark Shewmaker, 2004/07/22
- Re: SPF and Responsibility, David Brodbeck, 2004/07/22
- Re: SPF and Responsibility, Mark Shewmaker, 2004/07/22
- Re: *****SPAM***** Re: SPF and Responsibility, Nico Kadel-Garcia, 2004/07/23
- Re: SPF and Responsibility, Stuart D. Gathman, 2004/07/22
- Re: SPF and Responsibility, Len Conrad, 2004/07/22
- Re: SPF and Responsibility, Stuart D. Gathman, 2004/07/22
- RE: SPF and Responsibility, John Glube, 2004/07/23
- Re: SPF and Responsibility, Andriy G. Tereshchenko, 2004/07/23
- Re: SPF and Responsibility, Greg Wooledge, 2004/07/22
- Re: SPF and Responsibility, Stuart D. Gathman, 2004/07/21
- Re: SPF and Responsibility, Michel Bouissou, 2004/07/21
- Re: SPF and Responsibility, Jef Poskanzer, 2004/07/21
Re: SPF is not usable as legal measure against spammers,
administrator,
2004/07/17
- Re: SPF is not usable as legal measure against spammers, Paul Howarth, 2004/07/17
- Re: *****SPAM***** Re: SPF is not usable as legal measure against spammers, Nico Kadel-Garcia, 2004/07/18
- Re: *****SPAM***** Re: SPF is not usable as legal measure against spammers, Paul Howarth, 2004/07/18
- Re: *****SPAM***** Re: SPF is not usable as legal measure against spammers, Koen Martens, 2004/07/19
- Re: *****SPAM***** Re: SPF is not usable as legal measure against spammers, Andriy G. Tereshchenko, 2004/07/19
- Re: SPF is not usable as legal measure against spammers, Michel Bouissou, 2004/07/19
- Re: SPF is not usable as legal measure against spammers, Nico Kadel-Garcia, 2004/07/19
- Re: SPF is not usable as legal measure against spammers, Roger Moser, 2004/07/17
Re: SPF is not usable as legal measure against spammers,
administrator,
2004/07/16
- Re: SPF is not usable as legal measure against spammers, rgreene(_at_)tclme(_dot_)org, 2004/07/16
- Re: SPF is not usable as legal measure against spammers, Roger Moser, 2004/07/17
- Re: *****SPAM***** Re: SPF is not usable as legal measure against spammers, Nico Kadel-Garcia, 2004/07/18
- Re: SPF is not usable as legal measure against spammers, Roger Moser, 2004/07/18
- Re: PTR lookups in SPF (was: SPF is not usableaslegal measure against spammers.), Andriy G. Tereshchenko, 2004/07/18
- Re: PTR lookups in SPF, Roger Moser, 2004/07/19
- Re: Re: PTR lookups in SPF, Len Conrad, 2004/07/19
- Re: Re: PTR lookups in SPF, Roger Moser, 2004/07/19
- Re: Re: PTR lookups in SPF, william(at)elan.net, 2004/07/19
- Re: Re: PTR lookups in SPF, Jason Gurtz, 2004/07/19
- Re: Re: PTR lookups in SPF, Len Conrad, 2004/07/19
- Re: Re: PTR lookups in SPF, Stuart D. Gathman, 2004/07/19
- Re: Re: PTR lookups in SPF, David Brodbeck, 2004/07/20
- Re: PTR lookups in SPF (was: SPF is not usableaslegal measure against spammers.), Andriy G. Tereshchenko, 2004/07/19
- Re: PTR lookups in SPF, Paul Howarth, 2004/07/19
- Re: Re: PTR lookups in SPF, Graham Murray, 2004/07/19
- Re: Re: PTR lookups in SPF, David Brodbeck, 2004/07/20
- Re: PTR lookups in SPF (was: SPF is not usableaslegal measure against spammers.), Stuart D. Gathman, 2004/07/19
- Re: SPF is not usable as legal measure against spammers, David Brodbeck, 2004/07/20
Microsoft & Sender ID - SPF confusion as of mid July 2004,
Holm, Mark,
2004/07/14
- Re: Microsoft & Sender ID - SPF confusion as of mid July 2004, Michel Bouissou, 2004/07/14
- Re: Microsoft & Sender ID - SPF confusion as of mid July 2004, Chuck Mead, 2004/07/14
- Re: Microsoft & Sender ID - SPF confusion as of mid July 2004, Michel Bouissou, 2004/07/14
- Re: Microsoft & Sender ID - SPF confusion as of mid July 2004, Chuck Mead, 2004/07/14
- Re: Microsoft & Sender ID - SPF confusion as of mid July 2004, Mark Lentczner, 2004/07/14
- Re: Microsoft & Sender ID - SPF confusion as of mid July 2004, Chuck Mead, 2004/07/14
- Re: Microsoft & Sender ID - SPF confusion as of mid July 2004, Mark Lentczner, 2004/07/14
- RE: Microsoft & Sender ID - SPF confusion as of mid July 2004, John Glube, 2004/07/14
- Re: Microsoft & Sender ID - SPF confusion as of mid July 2004, wayne, 2004/07/14
- Re: Microsoft & Sender ID - SPF confusion as of mid July 2004, Waitman C Gobble II, 2004/07/14
- fair chance?, Marc Kool, 2004/07/14
- Re: fair chance?, Chuck Mead, 2004/07/14
- Re: fair chance?, Jonathan Gardner, 2004/07/15
- Re: fair chance?, wayne, 2004/07/15
- Re: fair chance?, Koen Martens, 2004/07/16
- Re: fair chance?, Michel Bouissou, 2004/07/16
- Re: fair chance?, Koen Martens, 2004/07/16
- Re: fair chance?, Jonathan Gardner, 2004/07/16
- Re: Microsoft & Sender ID - SPF confusion as of mid July 2004, Jonathan Gardner, 2004/07/15
Citibank,
Bourque Daniel,
2004/07/14
- Re: Citibank, Whil Hentzen, 2004/07/14
- Re: Citibank, Meng Weng Wong, 2004/07/14
- Re[2]: Citibank, Chris Drake, 2004/07/14
- Re: Citibank, Meng Weng Wong, 2004/07/14
- Re[2]: Citibank, Chris Drake, 2004/07/14
- Re: Citibank, Koen Martens, 2004/07/15
- Re: Citibank, Meng Weng Wong, 2004/07/14
- Re: Citibank, David Brodbeck, 2004/07/14
- Re: Citibank, Stuart D. Gathman, 2004/07/15
- Re: Citibank, Koen Martens, 2004/07/15
- Re: *****SPAM***** Citibank, Nico Kadel-Garcia, 2004/07/14
MX secondary problem?,
Dennis Carr,
2004/07/13
- Re: MX secondary problem?, Mark Lentczner, 2004/07/13
- Re: MX secondary problem?, Koen Martens, 2004/07/13
- Re: MX secondary problem?, Ralf Doeblitz, 2004/07/15
- RE: MX secondary problem?, Ryan Malayter, 2004/07/13
- RE: MX secondary problem?, Ryan Malayter, 2004/07/14
SPF is not usable as legal measure against spammers. DomainKeys are probably yes. Routers hacked by spammers scenario.,
Andrew G. Tereschenko,
2004/07/13
- Re: SPF is not usable as legal measure against spammers., Jonathan Gardner, 2004/07/13
- Re: SPF is not usable as legal measure against spammers., Andrew G. Tereschenko, 2004/07/13
- Re: *****SPAM***** Re: SPF is not usable as legal measure against spammers., Nico Kadel-Garcia, 2004/07/14
- Re: SPF is not usable as legal measure against spammers., Jonathan Gardner, 2004/07/14
- Re: SPF is not usable as legal measure against spammers., Chuck Mead, 2004/07/14
- Re: SPF is not usable as legal measure against spammers., Ralf Doeblitz, 2004/07/15
- Re: SPF is not usable as legal measure against spammers., Paul Howarth, 2004/07/14
- Re: SPF is not usable as legal measure against spammers., John Keown, 2004/07/14
- Re: SPF is not usable as legal measure against spammers., Paul Howarth, 2004/07/14
- Re: SPF is not usable as legal measure against spammers., John Keown, 2004/07/14
- Re: SPF is not usable as legal measure against spammers., Paul Howarth, 2004/07/14
- Re: SPF is not usable as legal measure against spammers., John Keown, 2004/07/14
- Re: *****SPAM***** Re: SPF is not usable as legal measure against spammers., Nico Kadel-Garcia, 2004/07/14
- Re: SPF is not usable as legal measure against spammers., Meng Weng Wong, 2004/07/14
- Re: SPF is not usable as legal measure against spammers., Andriy G. Tereshchenko, 2004/07/14
- Re: SPF is not usable as legal measure against spammers., Meng Weng Wong, 2004/07/15
- Re: SPF is not usable as legal measure against spammers., Andriy G. Tereshchenko, 2004/07/14
- Re: SPF is not usable as legal measure against spammers., Meng Weng Wong, 2004/07/15
- Re: SPF is not usable as legal measure against spammers., Jonathan Gardner, 2004/07/15
- Re: SPF is not usable as legal measure against spammers., Chuck Mead, 2004/07/15
- "Stripping Wars!" [Re: SPF is not usable as legal measure against spammers.], Hector Santos, 2004/07/15
- Re: "Stripping Wars!" [Re: SPF is not usable as legal measure against spammers.], Andriy G. Tereshchenko, 2004/07/15
- Re: "Stripping Wars!" [Re: SPF is not usable as legal measure against spammers.], david nicol, 2004/07/16
- Re: "Stripping Wars!" [Re: SPF is not usable aslegal measure against spammers.], Andriy G. Tereshchenko, 2004/07/16
- Re: "Stripping Wars!" [Re: SPF is not usable as legal measure against spammers.], Matt Burleigh, 2004/07/15
- Re: "Stripping Wars!" [Re: SPF is not usable as legal measure against spammers.], Hector Santos, 2004/07/15
- Re: "Stripping Wars!" [Re: SPF is not usable as legal measure against spammers.], Matt Burleigh, 2004/07/15
- Re: Re: "Stripping Wars!" [Re: SPF is not usable as legal measure against spammers.], Michael Weiner, 2004/07/15
- Re: Re: "Stripping Wars!" [Re: SPF is not usable as legal measure against spammers.], Waitman Gobble, 2004/07/15
- Re: "Stripping Wars!" [Re: SPF is not usable as legal measure against spammers.], Hector Santos, 2004/07/15
- Re: "Stripping Wars!" [Re: SPF is not usable as legal measure against spammers.], Matt Burleigh, 2004/07/16
- Alias/Real Email Accounts [Re: "Stripping Wars!" [Re: SPF is not usable as legal measure against spammers.]], Hector Santos, 2004/07/16
- Re: "Stripping Wars!" [Re: SPF is not usable as legal measure against spammers.], Mark Hardee, 2004/07/16
- Re: SPF is not usable as legal measure against spammers., Hector Santos, 2004/07/15
- Re: I Invoke Godwin's law on GMail soap opera scripts, Jonathan Gardner, 2004/07/16
- Re: SPF is not usable as legal measure against spammers., Jonathan Gardner, 2004/07/14
- Re: SPF is not usable as legal measure against spammers., Paul Howarth, 2004/07/14
- Re: SPF is not usable as legal measure against spammers., Jonathan Gardner, 2004/07/15
- Re: SPF is not usable as legal measure against spammers., Andriy G. Tereshchenko, 2004/07/14
- Re: *****SPAM***** Re: SPF is not usable as legal measure against spammers., Nico Kadel-Garcia, 2004/07/14
- Re: SPF is not usable as legal measure against spammers., Jonathan Gardner, 2004/07/15
- Re: Re: SPF is not usable as legal measure against spammers., Waitman C Gobble II, 2004/07/15
- Re: *****SPAM***** Re: SPF is not usable as legal measure against spammers., Nico Kadel-Garcia, 2004/07/15
- Re: *****SPAM***** Re: SPF is not usable as legal measure against spammers., Stuart D. Gathman, 2004/07/15
- Re: *****SPAM***** Re: SPF is not usable as legal measure against spammers., Jonathan Gardner, 2004/07/16
- Re: *****SPAM***** Re: *****SPAM***** Re: SPF is not usable as legal measure against spammers., Nico Kadel-Garcia, 2004/07/16
- Re: SPF is not usable as legal measure against spammers., Jonathan Gardner, 2004/07/19
- Re: *****SPAM***** Re: SPF is not usable as legal measure against spammers., David Brodbeck, 2004/07/20
- Re: Re: SPF is not usable as legal measure against spammers., Nico Kadel-Garcia, 2004/07/20
- Re: Re: SPF is not usable as legal measure against spammers., Paul Howarth, 2004/07/20
- Re: *****SPAM***** Re: Re: SPF is not usable as legal measure against spammers., Nico Kadel-Garcia, 2004/07/20
- Re: *****SPAM***** Re: Re: SPF is not usable as legal measure against spammers., Paul Howarth, 2004/07/20
- Re: Re: SPF is not usable as legal measure against spammers., Stuart D. Gathman, 2004/07/20
- Re: SPF is not usable as legal measure against spammers., Roger Moser, 2004/07/20
- IMPORTANT: The main point Nico and Co. are trying to make, Stuart D. Gathman, 2004/07/20
- Re: *****SPAM***** IMPORTANT: The main point Nico and Co. are trying to make, Nico Kadel-Garcia, 2004/07/21
- Re: Re: SPF is not usable as legal measure against spammers., Roger B.A. Klorese , 2004/07/20
- Re: Re: SPF is not usable as legal measure against spammers., Len Conrad, 2004/07/20
- Re: Re: SPF is not usable as legal measure against spammers., Roger B.A. Klorese , 2004/07/20
- RE: SPF is not usable as legal measure against spammers. DomainKeys are probably yes. Routers hacked by spammers scenario., John Glube, 2004/07/13
To all SPF-ians: Time for Chocolate,
Mark Lentczner,
2004/07/12
- Re: To all SPF-ians: Time for Chocolate, Justin Mason, 2004/07/12
- Re: To all SPF-ians: Time for Chocolate, Meng Weng Wong, 2004/07/12
- Re: To all SPF-ians: Time for Chocolate, Lloyd Zusman, 2004/07/12
- Re: Re: To all SPF-ians: Time for Chocolate, wayne, 2004/07/12
- RE: Re: To all SPF-ians: Time for Chocolate, John Glube, 2004/07/12
- Re: Re: To all SPF-ians: Time for Chocolate, wayne, 2004/07/12
- RE: Re: To all SPF-ians: Time for Chocolate, John Glube, 2004/07/12
- Re: To all SPF-ians: Time for Chocolate, Lloyd Zusman, 2004/07/13
- Re: To all SPF-ians: Time for Chocolate, wayne, 2004/07/12
Are SPF fault tolerant ? How to make SPF records changed correctly ?,
Andrew G. Tereschenko,
2004/07/12
- Re: Are SPF fault tolerant ? How to make SPF records changed correctly ?, Meng Weng Wong, 2004/07/12
- Re: Are SPF fault tolerant ? How to make SPF records changed correctly ?, Ralf Doeblitz, 2004/07/13
- Re: Are SPF fault tolerant ? How to make SPF records changed correctly ?, Andrew G. Tereschenko, 2004/07/13
- Re: Are SPF fault tolerant ? How to make SPF records changed correctly ?, Koen Martens, 2004/07/13
- Re: Are SPF fault tolerant ? How to make SPF records changed correctly ?, David Brodbeck, 2004/07/13
- Re: Are SPF fault tolerant ? How to make SPF records changed correctly ?, Andrew G. Tereschenko, 2004/07/13
- RE: Are SPF fault tolerant ? How to make SPF records changed correctly ?, Seth Goodman, 2004/07/13
- Re: Are SPF fault tolerant ? How to make SPF records changed correctly ?, Andrew G. Tereschenko, 2004/07/13
- Re: Are SPF fault tolerant ? How to make SPF records changed correctly ?, Meng Weng Wong, 2004/07/13
- Re: Are SPF fault tolerant ? How to make SPF records changed correctly ?, Andrew G. Tereschenko, 2004/07/13
- Re: Are SPF fault tolerant ? How to make SPF records changed correctly ?, Meng Weng Wong, 2004/07/13
- Re[2]: Are SPF fault tolerant ? How to make SPF records changed correctly ?, Chris Drake, 2004/07/13
- Re: Are SPF fault tolerant ? How to make SPF records changed correctly ?, Meng Weng Wong, 2004/07/13
- Re: Are SPF fault tolerant ? How to make SPF records changed correctly ?, wayne, 2004/07/14
- Re: Are SPF fault tolerant ? How to make SPF records changed correctly ?, spf, 2004/07/14
- Re: Are SPF fault tolerant ? How to make SPF records changed correctly ?, Koen Martens, 2004/07/14
- RE: Are SPF fault tolerant ? How to make SPF records changed correctly ?, Seth Goodman, 2004/07/14
- Re: Are SPF fault tolerant ? How to make SPF records changed correctly ?, Andriy G. Tereshchenko, 2004/07/14
- RE: Are SPF fault tolerant ? How to make SPF records changed correctly ?, Seth Goodman, 2004/07/15
- Re: Are SPF fault tolerant ? How to make SPF records changed correctly ?, Andriy G. Tereshchenko, 2004/07/15
- Re: Are SPF fault tolerant ? How to make SPF records changed correctly ?, Waitman C Gobble II, 2004/07/15
- RE: Are SPF fault tolerant ? How to make SPF records changed correctly ?, Seth Goodman, 2004/07/15
- Re: Are SPF fault tolerant ? How to make SPF records changed correctly ?, Jonathan Gardner, 2004/07/13
- Re: Are SPF fault tolerant ? How to make SPF records changed correctly ?, Koen Martens, 2004/07/13
- Re: Are SPF fault tolerant ? How to make SPF records changed correctly ?, Jonathan Gardner, 2004/07/13
Intuit,
Waitman C Gobble II,
2004/07/12
- Re: Intuit, Meng Weng Wong, 2004/07/12
- Re: Intuit, Waitman C Gobble II, 2004/07/12
- Re: Intuit, Meng Weng Wong, 2004/07/12
- Re: Intuit, Waitman C Gobble II, 2004/07/12
- Re: Intuit, Meng Weng Wong, 2004/07/12
- Re: Intuit, Waitman C Gobble II, 2004/07/12
- Re: Intuit, dr . midgley, 2004/07/15
- Re: Intuit, Waitman C Gobble II, 2004/07/15
"redirect" in an included SPF record,
Roger Moser,
2004/07/11
- Re: "redirect" in an included SPF record, Meng Weng Wong, 2004/07/11
- Re: "redirect" in an included SPF record, wayne, 2004/07/11
- Re: "redirect" in an included SPF record, Frank Ellermann, 2004/07/12
- Re: Re: "redirect" in an included SPF record, Meng Weng Wong, 2004/07/12
- Re: "redirect" in an included SPF record, Frank Ellermann, 2004/07/12
- Re: Re: "redirect" in an included SPF record, wayne, 2004/07/12
- Re: "redirect" in an included SPF record, Frank Ellermann, 2004/07/12
- Re: Re: "redirect" in an included SPF record, Roger Moser, 2004/07/12
- Re: "redirect" in an included SPF record, Frank Ellermann, 2004/07/12
- Re: Re: "redirect" in an included SPF record, wayne, 2004/07/12
Is there is proposed checks on bounces and delivery notification ?,
Andrew G. Tereschenko,
2004/07/10
- Re: Is there is proposed checks on bounces and delivery notification ?, Meng Weng Wong, 2004/07/10
- Re: Is there is proposed checks on bounces and delivery notification ?, Andrew G. Tereschenko, 2004/07/11
- Re[2]: Is there is proposed checks on bounces and delivery notification ?, Chris Drake, 2004/07/11
- Re: Re[2]: Is there is proposed checks on bounces and delivery notification ?, Andrew G. Tereschenko, 2004/07/11
- Re[4]: Is there is proposed checks on bounces and delivery notification ?, Chris Drake, 2004/07/11
- Re: Is there is proposed checks on bounces and delivery notification ?, Jim Paris, 2004/07/11
- Re: Is there is proposed checks on bounces and delivery notification ?, Stephane Bortzmeyer, 2004/07/12
- Re: Is there is proposed checks on bounces and delivery notification ?, Stephane Bortzmeyer, 2004/07/12
- Re: Re[4]: Is there is proposed checks on bounces and delivery notification ?, Andrew G. Tereschenko, 2004/07/12
- Re: Re[4]: Is there is proposed checks on bounces and delivery notification ?, Roger Moser, 2004/07/12
- Re: Is there is proposed checks on bounces and delivery notification ?, wayne, 2004/07/13
- Re: Re[4]: Is there is proposed checks on bounces and delivery notification ?, Ralf Doeblitz, 2004/07/13
- Re: Re[4]: Is there is proposed checks on bounces and delivery notification ?, Andrew G. Tereschenko, 2004/07/13
- Re: Re[4]: Is there is proposed checks on bounces and delivery notification ?, Ralf Doeblitz, 2004/07/14
- Re: Is there is proposed checks on bounces and delivery notification ?, Koen Martens, 2004/07/11
- Re: Is there is proposed checks on bounces and delivery notification ?, Chris Drake, 2004/07/11
Greeting Card sites catching on,
James Couzens,
2004/07/10
- Re: Greeting Card sites catching on, Meng Weng Wong, 2004/07/10
- Re: Greeting Card sites catching on, Andrew G. Tereschenko, 2004/07/10
- Re: Greeting Card sites catching on, Koen Martens, 2004/07/11
- Re: Greeting Card sites catching on, Graham Murray, 2004/07/11
- Re: Greeting Card sites catching on, Koen Martens, 2004/07/11
- Re: Greeting Card sites catching on, Andrew G. Tereschenko, 2004/07/11
- Re: Greeting Card sites catching on, Andrew G. Tereschenko, 2004/07/11
- Re: Greeting Card sites catching on, Koen Martens, 2004/07/11
- Re[2]: Greeting Card sites catching on, Chris Drake, 2004/07/11
- Re: Greeting Card sites catching on, Koen Martens, 2004/07/11
- Re: Re[2]: Greeting Card sites catching on, Andrew G. Tereschenko, 2004/07/11
- Re: Greeting Card sites catching on, Graham Murray, 2004/07/11
- Re[2]: Greeting Card sites catching on, Len Conrad, 2004/07/11
- Re: Re[2]: Greeting Card sites catching on, Michael Weiner, 2004/07/11
- Re: Re[2]: Greeting Card sites catching on, James Couzens, 2004/07/11
- Re: Re[2]: Greeting Card sites catching on, Andrew G. Tereschenko, 2004/07/11
- Re: Re[2]: Greeting Card sites catching on, Michael Weiner, 2004/07/11
- Re: Re[2]: Greeting Card sites catching on, James Couzens, 2004/07/11
- Re: Re[2]: Greeting Card sites catching on, Andrew G. Tereschenko, 2004/07/11
- Re: Re[2]: Greeting Card sites catching on, David Brodbeck, 2004/07/11
- Re: Greeting Card sites catching on, Michael Weiner, 2004/07/11
- Re: Greeting Card sites catching on, Carl Hutzler, 2004/07/11
Why TXT zone record location for SPF and Sender ID data are domain default ( @ TXT "data") ?,
Andrew G. Tereschenko,
2004/07/08
- Re: Why TXT zone record location for SPF and Sender ID data are domain default ( @ TXT "data") ?, Meng Weng Wong, 2004/07/08
- Re: Why TXT zone record location for SPF and Sender ID data are domain default ( @ TXT "data") ?, Andrew G. Tereschenko, 2004/07/08
- Re: Why TXT zone record location for SPF and Sender ID data are domain default ( @ TXT "data") ?, wayne, 2004/07/08
- Re: Why TXT zone record location for SPF and Sender ID data are domain default ( @ TXT "data") ?, Ralf Doeblitz, 2004/07/09
- Re: Why TXT zone record location for SPF and Sender ID data are domain default ( @ TXT "data") ?, Andrew G. Tereschenko, 2004/07/09
- Re: Why TXT zone record location for SPF and Sender ID data are domain default ( @ TXT "data") ?, Ralf Doeblitz, 2004/07/10
- Re: Why TXT zone record location for SPF and Sender ID data are domain default ( @ TXT "data") ?, Andrew G. Tereschenko, 2004/07/10
- Re: Why TXT zone record location for SPF and Sender ID data are domain default ( @ TXT "data") ?, Len Conrad, 2004/07/10
- Re: Why TXT zone record location for SPF and Sender ID data are domain default ( @ TXT "data") ?, Ralf Doeblitz, 2004/07/11
- Re: Why TXT zone record location for SPF and Sender ID data are domain default ( @ TXT "data") ?, Andrew G. Tereschenko, 2004/07/11
- Re: Why TXT zone record location for SPF and Sender ID data are domain default ( @ TXT "data") ?, Greg Connor, 2004/07/11
- Re: Why TXT zone record location for SPF and Sender ID data are domain default ( @ TXT "data") ?, Roger Moser, 2004/07/08
OT: Change of address,
Paul Iadonisi,
2004/07/07
- Re: OT: Change of address, Chris Haynes, 2004/07/07
- Re: OT: Change of address, Gregg R . Allen, 2004/07/07
- RE: OT: Change of address, Seth Goodman, 2004/07/08
- Re: OT: Change of address, spf, 2004/07/08
- RE: OT: Change of address, Seth Goodman, 2004/07/08
- Re: OT: Change of address, Koen Martens, 2004/07/08
- Re: OT: Change of address, Jason Gurtz, 2004/07/08
- Re: OT: Change of address, Andrew G. Tereschenko, 2004/07/09
Scope macro, alternative syntaxes, and use cases,
Mark Lentczner,
2004/07/05
- Re: Scope macro, alternative syntaxes, and use cases, Roger Moser, 2004/07/05
- RE: Scope macro, alternative syntaxes, and use cases, Seth Goodman, 2004/07/06
- Re: Scope macro, alternative syntaxes, and use cases, wayne, 2004/07/06
- RE: Scope macro, alternative syntaxes, and use cases, Seth Goodman, 2004/07/06
- Re: Scope macro, alternative syntaxes, and use cases, Hector Santos, 2004/07/07
- RE: Scope macro, alternative syntaxes, and use cases, Seth Goodman, 2004/07/07
- What else to go into the pot?, Meng Weng Wong, 2004/07/07
- Re: What else to go into the pot?, Roger Moser, 2004/07/07
- who will use scopes?, Meng Weng Wong, 2004/07/08
- Re: who will use scopes?, Roger Moser, 2004/07/08
- Re: who will use scopes?, Mark Lentczner, 2004/07/08
- RE: who will use scopes?, Seth Goodman, 2004/07/08
- Re: who will use scopes?, wayne, 2004/07/08
- Re: who will use scopes?, Frank Ellermann, 2004/07/09
- Re: who will use scopes?, Roger Moser, 2004/07/09
- Re: What else to go into the pot?, Tony Finch, 2004/07/08
- RE: What else to go into the pot?, Scott Kitterman, 2004/07/08
- Re: Scope macro, alternative syntaxes, and use cases, Frank Ellermann, 2004/07/06
Unified SPF works in progress now in alpha,
Meng Weng Wong,
2004/07/03
- Re: Unified SPF works in progress now in alpha, Roger Moser, 2004/07/04
- Re: Unified SPF works in progress now in alpha, william(at)elan.net, 2004/07/04
- Re: Unified SPF works in progress now in alpha, Meng Weng Wong, 2004/07/04
- Re: Unified SPF works in progress now in alpha, Frank Ellermann, 2004/07/04
- Re: Unified SPF works in progress now in alpha, william(at)elan.net, 2004/07/05
- RE: Unified SPF works in progress now in alpha, Seth Goodman, 2004/07/05
- Re: Unified SPF works in progress now in alpha, Roger Moser, 2004/07/05
- Unified SPF works in progress now in alpha, Roy Badami, 2004/07/05
- RE: Unified SPF works in progress now in alpha, Seth Goodman, 2004/07/05
- Re: Unified SPF works in progress now in alpha, Graham Murray, 2004/07/05
- Re: Unified SPF works in progress now in alpha, Frank Ellermann, 2004/07/06
- RE: Re: Unified SPF works in progress now in alpha, Seth Goodman, 2004/07/06
- Re: Unified SPF works in progress now in alpha, Frank Ellermann, 2004/07/06
- RE: Re: Unified SPF works in progress now in alpha, Seth Goodman, 2004/07/07
- RE: Re: Unified SPF works in progress now in alpha, Stuart D. Gathman, 2004/07/07
- Re: Unified SPF works in progress now in alpha, Frank Ellermann, 2004/07/09
- RE: Re: Unified SPF works in progress now in alpha, Seth Goodman, 2004/07/09
- RE: Re: Unified SPF works in progress now in alpha, Mark Shewmaker, 2004/07/09
- RE: Re: Unified SPF works in progress now in alpha, Seth Goodman, 2004/07/09
- Re: Re: Unified SPF works in progress now in alpha, Meng Weng Wong, 2004/07/10
- RE: Re: Unified SPF works in progress now in alpha, Seth Goodman, 2004/07/10
- RE: Re: Unified SPF works in progress now in alpha, Mark Shewmaker, 2004/07/10
- Re: Re: Unified SPF works in progress now in alpha, Andrew G. Tereschenko, 2004/07/10
- Re: Re: Unified SPF works in progress now in alpha, Mark Shewmaker, 2004/07/10
- Re: Re: Unified SPF works in progress now in alpha, Andrew G. Tereschenko, 2004/07/10
- Re: Re: Unified SPF works in progress now in alpha, Mark Shewmaker, 2004/07/10
- Re: Re: Unified SPF works in progress now in alpha, Andrew G. Tereschenko, 2004/07/10
- Re: Re: Unified SPF works in progress now in alpha, Mark Shewmaker, 2004/07/10
- Re: Unified SPF works in progress now in alpha, Frank Ellermann, 2004/07/11
- RE: Re: Unified SPF works in progress now in alpha, Seth Goodman, 2004/07/11
- Dynamic IP & MTAMARK=No - why accept them?, Karl Prince, 2004/07/06
- Re: Dynamic IP & MTAMARK=No - why accept them?, william(at)elan.net, 2004/07/06
- RE: Dynamic IP & MTAMARK=No - why accept them?, Seth Goodman, 2004/07/07
- Re: Dynamic IP & MTAMARK=No - why accept them?, Chris Drake, 2004/07/06
- RE: Dynamic IP & MTAMARK=No - why accept them?, Seth Goodman, 2004/07/07
- RE: Unified SPF works in progress now in alpha, Gary Levell, 2004/07/06
- RE: Re: Unified SPF works in progress now in alpha, Ryan Malayter, 2004/07/09
Re: wizard.html problems,
Frank Ellermann,
2004/07/01
- Re: Re: wizard.html problems, Koen Martens, 2004/07/01
- Re: Re: wizard.html problems, Shevek, 2004/07/02
- Re: wizard.html problems, Frank Ellermann, 2004/07/02
- Re: Re: wizard.html problems, Koen Martens, 2004/07/02
- Re: wizard.html problems, Frank Ellermann, 2004/07/02
- Re: Re: wizard.html problems, Koen Martens, 2004/07/03
- Re: wizard.html problems, Frank Ellermann, 2004/07/03
- Re: Re: wizard.html problems, Koen Martens, 2004/07/03
- Re: wizard.html problems, Frank Ellermann, 2004/07/04
- Re: Re: wizard.html problems, Koen Martnes, 2004/07/05
- Re: wizard.html problems, Frank Ellermann, 2004/07/06
- Re: Re: wizard.html problems, Scott Kitterman, 2004/07/03
- Re: wizard.html problems, Frank Ellermann, 2004/07/03
- Re: Re: wizard.html problems, Michael Weiner, 2004/07/03
- Re: Re: wizard.html problems, gmc, 2004/07/03
- Re: wizard.html problems, Frank Ellermann, 2004/07/04
- Re: Re: wizard.html problems, Koen Martens, 2004/07/04
- Re: wizard.html problems, Frank Ellermann, 2004/07/06
libspf vs libspf2? Hunh?,
Jeff A. Earickson,
2004/07/01
- Re: libspf vs libspf2? Hunh?, Koen Martens, 2004/07/01
- Re: libspf vs libspf2? Hunh?, James Couzens, 2004/07/01
- Re: libspf vs libspf2? Hunh?, Shevek, 2004/07/02
- Reputation Services and HELO/EHLO Checking For Unified SPF, spf, 2004/07/02
- RE: Reputation Services and HELO/EHLO Checking For Unified SPF, Seth Goodman, 2004/07/02
- RE: Reputation Services and HELO/EHLO Checking For Unified SPF, spf, 2004/07/02
- Re: Reputation Services and HELO/EHLO Checking For Unified SPF, Meng Weng Wong, 2004/07/02
- RE: Reputation Services and HELO/EHLO Checking For Unified SPF, spf, 2004/07/02
- RE: Reputation Services and HELO/EHLO Checking For Unified SPF, Karl Prince, 2004/07/02
- RE: Reputation Services and HELO/EHLO Checking For Unified SPF, spf, 2004/07/02
- RE: Reputation Services and HELO/EHLO Checking For Unified SPF, Karl Prince, 2004/07/04
- Re: Reputation Services and HELO/EHLO Checking For Unified SPF, Graham Murray, 2004/07/04
- Re: Reputation Services and HELO/EHLO Checking For Unified SPF, Karl Prince, 2004/07/04
- RE: Reputation Services and HELO/EHLO Checking For Unified SPF, Seth Goodman, 2004/07/05
- RE: Reputation Services and HELO/EHLO Checking For Unified SPF, David Brodbeck, 2004/07/11
- Re: Reputation Services and HELO/EHLO Checking For Unified SPF, Hector Santos, 2004/07/11
- Re: Reputation Services and HELO/EHLO Checking For Unified SPF, David Brodbeck, 2004/07/11
- Re: Reputation Services and HELO/EHLO Checking For Unified SPF, Meng Weng Wong, 2004/07/11
- Re: Reputation Services and HELO/EHLO Checking For Unified SPF, Hector Santos, 2004/07/12
- Re: Reputation Services and HELO/EHLO Checking For Unified SPF, Hector Santos, 2004/07/12
- Re: ISP eavesdropping on mail: UK [was ....], Adrian Midgley, 2004/07/13
- Re: Reputation Services and HELO/EHLO Checking For Unified SPF, Mark Shewmaker, 2004/07/02
Boycott Caller-ID for E-mail,
Reggie B.,
2004/07/01
- Re: Boycott Caller-ID for E-mail, Meng Weng Wong, 2004/07/01
- Re: Boycott Caller-ID for E-mail, Michel Bouissou, 2004/07/13
- Re: Boycott Caller-ID for E-mail, Jonathan Gardner, 2004/07/13
- Sender ID algorithm in a nutshell, Meng Weng Wong, 2004/07/13
- Re: Sender ID algorithm in a nutshell, Michel Bouissou, 2004/07/13
- Re: Sender ID algorithm in a nutshell, Weldon Whipple, 2004/07/13
- Re: Sender ID algorithm in a nutshell, Meng Weng Wong, 2004/07/13
- Re: Sender ID algorithm in a nutshell, Michel Bouissou, 2004/07/14
- Re: Boycott Caller-ID for E-mail, Mark Lentczner, 2004/07/13
- Re: Boycott Caller-ID for E-mail, Frank Ellermann, 2004/07/13