spf-discuss
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Re[2]: Greeting Card sites catching on

2004-07-11 08:35:48

*.spftools.net. IN TXT "v=spf1 redirect=spftools.net"

On Sun, 2004-07-11 at 08:23, Michael Weiner wrote:
On Sun, 11 Jul 2004 10:12:52 -0500, Len Conrad 
<lconrad(_at_)go2france(_dot_)com> wrote:

Why is this lame?  You only really need SPF on your MTA's domain(s)

only if the envelope sender is  sender(_at_)mta(_dot_)domain(_dot_)

one needs SPF records for each envelope @sender.domains, right?


seems thats what we are saying is Best Practice

Michael Weiner

-------
Sender Policy Framework: http://spf.pobox.com/
Archives at http://archives.listbox.com/spf-discuss/current/
Send us money!  http://spf.pobox.com/donations.html
To unsubscribe, change your address, or temporarily deactivate your 
subscription, 
please go to 
http://v2.listbox.com/member/?listname=spf-discuss(_at_)v2(_dot_)listbox(_dot_)com
-- 
James Couzens,
Programmer
-----------------------------------------------------------------
http://libspf.org -- ANSI C Sender Policy Framework library
http://libsrs.org -- ANSI C Sender Rewriting Scheme library
-----------------------------------------------------------------
PGP: http://gpg.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0x6E0396B3

-------
Sender Policy Framework: http://spf.pobox.com/
Archives at http://archives.listbox.com/spf-discuss/current/
Send us money!  http://spf.pobox.com/donations.html
To unsubscribe, change your address, or temporarily deactivate your 
subscription, 
please go to 
http://v2.listbox.com/member/?listname=spf-discuss(_at_)v2(_dot_)listbox(_dot_)com

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part