----- Original Message -----
From: <rogerk(_at_)queernet(_dot_)org>
To: <spf-discuss(_at_)v2(_dot_)listbox(_dot_)com>
Cc: <spf-discuss(_at_)v2(_dot_)listbox(_dot_)com>
Sent: Wednesday, July 28, 2004 9:27 AM
Subject: *****SPAM***** Re: [spf-discuss] Re: Military
Quoting John Keown <jdk(_at_)nni(_dot_)com>:
It is not the clients ip address that at issue but the smtp server ip
address that is important. As long as the clients is connecting to the
domains smtp server the clients ip address is not relevant.
As long as you refuse to get it through your head that there are
legitimate and
well-informed reasons for clients to use SMTP servers that are not under
the
administration of the domain provider, this entire discussion is not
relevant.
Sadly, I've found killfiles to be extremely useful in this discussion list
to deal with that kind of fixated foolishness. Let's move on to something
more interesting, shall we?
For example: I realize that sendmail.org was cooperating with Microsoft on
implementing their CallerID system. Does anyone have any word from them,
official or unofficial, on incorporating SPF directly?
Also, it's pretty clear that a lot of people rabidly detest Microsoft's
CallerID functionality. Can we encourage our beloved code authors (for whom
I give high praise for minimizing the impact of the latest email worms) to
include an option to use only Classic SPF, rather than including CallerID at
all?