Our mail server works on port 25 plus 4 other ports for smtp connections.
Also see the webmail discussion for a second solution.
It just requires a little work on the part of the mail administrator and
clients.
Second when spf get fully implemented and becomes a must do then blocking
port 25 is no longer needed or useful.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Michel Bouissou" <michel(_at_)bouissou(_dot_)net>
To: <spf-discuss(_at_)v2(_dot_)listbox(_dot_)com>
Sent: Wednesday, July 28, 2004 10:29 AM
Subject: Re: [spf-discuss] Re: Military
Le mercredi 28 Juillet 2004 10:37, Stephane Bortzmeyer a écrit :
We can assume that future SPF implementations will allow the system
administrator to refuse policies that are "too lax" such as the one
you mention or such as "v=spf1 a:0.0.0.0/0".
Better : we could hope that future SPF implementations would refuse to
work
for the military ;-)
--
Michel Bouissou <michel(_at_)bouissou(_dot_)net> OpenPGP ID 0xDDE8AC6E
-------
Sender Policy Framework: http://spf.pobox.com/
Archives at http://archives.listbox.com/spf-discuss/current/
Send us money! http://spf.pobox.com/donations.html
To unsubscribe, change your address, or temporarily deactivate your
subscription,
please go to
http://v2.listbox.com/member/?listname=spf-discuss(_at_)v2(_dot_)listbox(_dot_)com