On Thu, Jul 29, 2004 at 07:06:34PM +0200, Ralf Doeblitz wrote:
But I also do not have any problems with an /0 netmask, if the domain owner
insists on it. As long as that domain is not used for spam I see no reason
to blacklist it.
I have no problem with it either, all I am saying is that if one chooses
to have /0 the domain is very likely to get used for spam. And once that
happens it is very likely it will get blacklisted. So that's the
consequence of making such a choice.
I do not have any problem whatsoever with people not locking their bike
in Amsterdam. Sure, go ahead. But don't be surprised if a junkee has
taken it if you come back, and what's more don't blame the lockmakers
that you have to buy a lock because everyone does.
Koen
--
K.F.J. Martens, Sonologic, http://www.sonologic.nl/
Networking, embedded systems, unix expertise, artificial intelligence.
Public PGP key: http://www.metro.cx/pubkey-gmc.asc
Wondering about the funny attachment your mail program
can't read? Visit http://www.openpgp.org/
-------
Sender Policy Framework: http://spf.pobox.com/
Archives at http://archives.listbox.com/spf-discuss/current/
Send us money! http://spf.pobox.com/donations.html
To unsubscribe, change your address, or temporarily deactivate your
subscription,
please go to
http://v2.listbox.com/member/?listname=spf-discuss(_at_)v2(_dot_)listbox(_dot_)com
pgpEi3lRROCO4.pgp
Description: PGP signature