spf-discuss
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Re: Military

2004-07-29 10:06:34
--On Mittwoch, Juli 28, 2004 07:34:37 -0700 rogerk(_at_)queernet(_dot_)org 
wrote:

Quoting Koen Martens <spf(_at_)metro(_dot_)cx>:
i'm sure you can work something
out... have them put a special password in the subject line, and remail
only if it is there..

Voodoo.  When the major MUAs can do that *without* the need for the user
to do something every time they send, then it will be worth doing.

Use a cryptographic token in the signature that changes daily. Then the user only has to copy it (from a hardware key generator) once a day. If you put a rate limit on the service, even snooping this code means only, that a certain number of spam could be sent (and the suer would be able to use the service again the next day).

But I also do not have any problems with an /0 netmask, if the domain owner insists on it. As long as that domain is not used for spam I see no reason to blacklist it.

Ralf Döblitz


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>