-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
For those of you who are lurking on the IETF list please read my last
post to that list. "Re: Licensing issues" in response to
pbaker(_at_)verisign(_dot_)com(_dot_) For my part I've had enough of these guys
and their
instantaneous push back on the license discussion. As a class these
corporate guys *ALL* seem to think we've got no point and they really do
not seem to care about any possible encumbrance of this future RFC. If
you haven't posted I recommend that you *do* they need to understand
that this is a real issue and I don't think we should let them tell us
to shut up!
I was very tempted to start talking about whose technology the net runs
on anyway (majority is OSS) but I just didn't want to throw more fuel on
the "tin foil hat" argument.
- --
Chuck Mead
csm(_at_)moongroup(_dot_)com
Chief Tech @ http://moongroup.com - http://anirononline.com
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iD8DBQFA9/YQv6Gjsf2pQ0oRAvuJAKCBSTIY30ZuLc2GRB9PEpreNPtWIgCfcStF
KOrs9UF1Y6RgPI14WqWe894=
=qBn0
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----