-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Chuck Mead wrote:
| For those of you who are lurking on the IETF list please read my last
| post to that list. "Re: Licensing issues" in response to
| pbaker(_at_)verisign(_dot_)com(_dot_) For my part I've had enough of these
guys and their
| instantaneous push back on the license discussion. As a class these
| corporate guys *ALL* seem to think we've got no point and they really do
| not seem to care about any possible encumbrance of this future RFC. If
| you haven't posted I recommend that you *do* they need to understand
| that this is a real issue and I don't think we should let them tell us
| to shut up!
|
| I was very tempted to start talking about whose technology the net runs
| on anyway (majority is OSS) but I just didn't want to throw more fuel on
| the "tin foil hat" argument.
Chris Haynes added to my "last post" smack down on the IETF list. Let's
keep it going... the pressure needs to be more intense IMHO.
- --
Chuck Mead
csm(_at_)moongroup(_dot_)com
Chief Tech @ http://moongroup.com - http://anirononline.com
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iD8DBQFA+AM4v6Gjsf2pQ0oRAhF2AJ9F3ZA+sU13+5E36Mn12/sMSsTWOwCZAdjB
RAZ48mLsf/jFKhPeYGYpSqA=
=J2Tj
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----