-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
wayne wrote:
| In <40F80339(_dot_)8070605(_at_)moongroup(_dot_)com> Chuck Mead
<csm(_at_)moongroup(_dot_)com> writes:
|
|
|>Chris Haynes added to my "last post" smack down on the IETF list. Let's
|>keep it going... the pressure needs to be more intense IMHO.
|
|
|
| While I agree that voices should be heard on the MARID list in order
| for them to count, I think we also need to make sure that we keep a
| calm tone. In my opinion, the RFC that results from MARID must be
| usable by both OSS *and* commercial software and just about anything
| else. Starting up a GPL or anti-corporate flame war is not productive
| and should be carefully avoided.
Agreed and I don't think my post says that at all. I prefer the GPL but
am not interested in arguing about it. I simply want implementations of
all kinds to be unencumbered by license requirements like CID has in
theirs. Crap... I'm not even sure what their license means and then one
of those corporate guys says in private email to me that I should hire a
lawyer to figure it out! Hmmm... right... implementors will all have to
hire lawyers to figure out if they can implement a fscking standard from
the IETF... now *THAT* makes a lot of sense....
/me wishing I could say what I really think!
- --
Chuck Mead
csm(_at_)moongroup(_dot_)com
Chief Tech @ http://moongroup.com - http://anirononline.com
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iD8DBQFA+AcBv6Gjsf2pQ0oRAjZ2AJ9hw4P7Vgny6A+7UiZFET55IGEXcgCfbL5c
hhHEyovwpnVYow4iAu2k1YE=
=8E4V
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----