-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On Thursday 15 July 2004 03:28 pm, wayne wrote:
In <200407151127(_dot_)21153(_dot_)jonagard(_at_)amazon(_dot_)com> Jonathan
Gardner
<jonagard(_at_)amazon(_dot_)com> writes:
On Wednesday 14 July 2004 01:48 pm, Marc Kool wrote:
Microsoft has taken a big step by showing their willingness to merge
with SPF Classic. [...] Things don't go as fast as you may like,
so please be patient and wait with more criticism until Meng has had
another talk with Microsoft.
Better yet, let's just ignore them.
I do not think it is wise to ignore what MicroSoft is doing, or in the
case of the SenderID license and the complete lack of testing of their
PRA algorithm, not doing.
I didn't mean it the way you took it. I meant for the general public, what
Microsoft says about SPF, Sender ID, and MARID is largely irrelevant.
Microsoft is not the voice of the community, and their protocol is merely
one of many proposals.
As far as the general public should be concerned, Microsoft represents less
of the community than you do.
As protocol designers and people who participate in MARID and here, we have
to take Microsoft into account. For that matter, you have to take Amazon
and MyLittleDomain.com all into account.
- --
Jonathan M. Gardner
Mass Mail Systems Developer, Amazon.com
jonagard(_at_)amazon(_dot_)com
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFA+BXPBFeYcclU5Q0RAhDoAKDXuVbrzbO4r27XYEUjG10tMHAuFgCfdE2H
IRx+v/lU195wbgR+tei+9ME=
=L3D6
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----