-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Marc Kool wrote:
| Hi all,
|
| In many statements that mention Microsoft, I see lots of emotions.
|
| I agree with most of you about the quality of their software and weak
| security in the world's most popular email client.
|
| Microsoft has taken a big step by showing their willingness to merge
| with SPF Classic.
| FWIW: they also bought RAV antivirus to try to stop (spamming) virusses.
| Let's a little professional and give them a fair chance to show what
| they want.
| Things don't go as fast as you may like, so please be patient and wait
| with more criticism until Meng has had another talk with Microsoft.
While I certainly *DO* agree with you what we're trying to do now is get
the MARID committee to see that the license Microsoft is trying to
encumber this standard with is derived from Caller-ID which is,
essentially, dead at this point and yet the license is continuing to
live. We cannot get them to listen unless there is overwhelming
concensus that this is a problem.
- --
Chuck Mead
csm(_at_)moongroup(_dot_)com
Chief Tech @ http://moongroup.com - http://anirononline.com
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iD8DBQFA9apyv6Gjsf2pQ0oRAi4UAJ9PPvQ30BfHqYDDP/Nqv3opv+vHkQCcCVi3
GgvVCo8FWdPSa3NU9eehccg=
=PD9a
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----