On Thu, Jul 15, 2004 at 05:28:24PM -0500, wayne wrote:
Part of the work that needs to be done to make sure a bad license
doesn't make it to being an RFC is to make sure there is a rough
consensus that such a license is unacceptable. This can only be done
by posting a message to the MARID list that later on, you can point to
and say "See, I stood up and said that <whatever it is that you feel
is important>". Do you shouldn't post a rant or bash MicroSoft. You
don't even have to post detailed analysis of your views, in this case
a "me too</aol>" type post is enough.
Yes, i've been trying to post something to the marid list (ietf-mxcomp), but to
no avail, even though I have been subscribed to the list for 1 or 2 months now.
But it's a black hole, my mail is accepted, and that's it. Never ends up on
the list, doesn't get bounced or whatever.
I guess that list is for designated posters only, right?
Koen
--
K.F.J. Martens, Sonologic, http://www.sonologic.nl/
Networking, embedded systems, unix expertise, artificial intelligence.
Public PGP key: http://www.metro.cx/pubkey-gmc.asc
Wondering about the funny attachment your mail program
can't read? Visit http://www.openpgp.org/
-------
Sender Policy Framework: http://spf.pobox.com/
Archives at http://archives.listbox.com/spf-discuss/current/
Send us money! http://spf.pobox.com/donations.html
To unsubscribe, change your address, or temporarily deactivate your
subscription,
please go to
http://v2.listbox.com/member/?listname=spf-discuss(_at_)v2(_dot_)listbox(_dot_)com
pgpcoKOwFMuhP.pgp
Description: PGP signature