spf-discuss
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Microsoft & Sender ID - SPF confusion as of mid July 2004

2004-07-15 11:22:41
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On Wednesday 14 July 2004 11:57 am, Holm, Mark wrote:
I have been following the list casually on the archives and decided to
join in order to make this point.

There is still a pretty big difference, at least to the uninitiated,
between what Microsoft is publishing publicly and what the SPF community
is saying.  This can only lead to confusion and resistance to adoption.


What Microsoft says is largely irrelevant. Go read what MARID is saying. 
Better yet, listen to Meng.

I won't claim that Microsoft is lying. I will claim that they are not in any 
way shape or form a dictator of policy. They do not represent the community 
either. Don't listen to what they say.

- -- 
Jonathan M. Gardner
Mass Mail Systems Developer, Amazon.com
jonagard(_at_)amazon(_dot_)com
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFA9stxBFeYcclU5Q0RAkJUAJ9rOCkARFlfPBvpRVcXaOfRWjdjZACdE8w9
G5ryGtNvf/xiyRfUcn8urSQ=
=0NiP
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>