-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Michel Bouissou wrote:
| Le mercredi 14 Juillet 2004 22:18, Chuck Mead a écrit :
|
|>Wrong list! If you don't like the license and you want to affect
|>concensus on what the committee adopts you need to post your opinion to
|>the IETF MARID WG list... ietf-mxcomp(_at_)imc(_dot_)org(_dot_)
|
|
| I assumed this list was for discussing SPF in general, which includes
| political questions as well as technical questions. Isn't it ?
You misunderstand me. I am not trying to censure what you said at all...
I highly approve of it... I simply am trying to get you to see that
where the standard is concerned, if you want your opinion to *COUNT* for
something send your comments to the MARID list at IETF and not here. We
all agree with what you said I suspect but the standard is not being
developed here... it's being developed over there and your opinion needs
to be heard there much worse than here!
| My views on the topic are simple : Whatever wants to become an official
| "standard" cannot be encumbered with any kind of patents or licences. A
| standard must be public domain, free for anybody to comply with, use or
| implement without any kind of licences or constraints from any entity.
| Otherwise it cannot be a "standard", period.
Agreed... but as I said you are speaking to the choir here! Go say it on
the list that counts!
:-)
- --
Chuck Mead
csm(_at_)moongroup(_dot_)com
Chief Tech @ http://moongroup.com - http://anirononline.com
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iD8DBQFA9amAv6Gjsf2pQ0oRAjANAKCD6+/gTz2dioSDWGfpntxXIOkfOwCfSxE2
Xar+97bMIaJEleTkUVghZvs=
=BlTB
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----