-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Michel Bouissou wrote:
| Le mercredi 14 Juillet 2004 20:57, Holm, Mark a écrit :
|
|>Somebody needs to hold MS's feet to the fire on this asap. Probably needs
|>to be the big players like AOL. So long as MS continues to obfuscate the
|>agreed upon full back compatibility of SPF and Sender ID, the poor
slobs in
|>the real world trying to figure out what to do are going to be in a
quandry
|>and SPF will fail to thrive.
|
|
| My humble opinion about this is : Let MS crap and licenses to MS, go
for plain
| good ol'e SPF, there are 20,000 domains that have adopted it around,
there
| are good libraries and usable MTA extensions that are getting better
everyday
| and are not encumbered with MS patents or licensing issues. So the
choice is
| obvious.
Wrong list! If you don't like the license and you want to affect
concensus on what the committee adopts you need to post your opinion to
the IETF MARID WG list... ietf-mxcomp(_at_)imc(_dot_)org(_dot_)
- --
Chuck Mead
csm(_at_)moongroup(_dot_)com
Chief Tech @ http://moongroup.com - http://anirononline.com
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iD8DBQFA9ZUBv6Gjsf2pQ0oRAiS3AKCX5xshhUYcrRX2J+3nzvYeV6SHugCfe1NQ
AXv/qpyeNzP5cMt1qXCtzqU=
=hYXP
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----