RE: SPF and Responsibility

On Thu, 2004-07-22 at 07:39, terry(_at_)greatgulfhomes(_dot_)com wrote:

You are correct in that the wording of the spec is misleading.


This is the current wording:

  5.2  Pass

    An SMTP server receiving this result SHOULD treat the message as
    authentic.  It may accept or reject the message depending on other
    policies.

How is that misleading?

-- 
Mark Shewmaker
mark(_at_)primefactor(_dot_)com

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
Re: SPF and Responsibility, (continued) Re: SPF and Responsibility, Stuart D. Gathman Re: SPF and Responsibility, David Beveridge Re: SPF and Responsibility, Mark Shewmaker Re: SPF and Responsibility, David Beveridge Re: SPF and Responsibility, Mark Shewmaker Re: SPF and Responsibility, David Beveridge Re: SPF and Responsibility, Mark Shewmaker Re: SPF and Responsibility, Michel Bouissou Re: SPF and Responsibility, Mark Shewmaker RE: SPF and Responsibility, terry RE: SPF and Responsibility, Mark Shewmaker <= RE: SPF and Responsibility, terry Re: SPF and Responsibility, Daniel Taylor RE: SPF and Responsibility, terry RE: SPF and Responsibility, Mark Shewmaker Re: SPF and Responsibility, Andriy G. Tereshchenko Re: SPF and Responsibility, Mark Shewmaker Re: SPF and Responsibility, Greg Wooledge Re: SPF and Responsibility, Daniel Taylor Re: SPF and Responsibility, Michel Bouissou Re: SPF and Responsibility, Daniel Taylor

Previous by Date:	Re: SPF and Responsibility, Jonathan Gardner
Next by Date:	Re: *SPAM* Re: SPF and Responsibility, Nico Kadel-Garcia
Previous by Thread:	RE: SPF and Responsibility, terry
Next by Thread:	RE: SPF and Responsibility, terry
Indexes:	[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]