On Thu, 2004-07-01 at 11:00, Koen Martens wrote:
Afaik there is a sendmail patch for libspf, but as of yet none for
libspf2 (i promised i'd cough this up somewhere this week)..
Correct. Its fully and properly implemented into Sendmail as per their
guidelines for extensions. Teddy has done a wonderful job of it such
that it barely resembles my original one.
For now i'm still using the milter found on the spf.pobox.com, but it
turns out there are actually several milter implementations.
You might wish to give RC3 a try and see what you think. Its definitely
faster.
In fact, this whole business is getting quite confusing. I mean, it's
good to have alternatives. But I'm completely lost now and the zillions
of spf/srs implementations around..
You Sir, are preaching to the choir. Perhaps you would like to
contribute to a project that doesn't intentionally try to mislead and
confuse the public. There is always room for more help and refinement.
Alternate implementations are a great idea, and I encourage it. They
almost always lead to better code and ideas more sound in design and
implementation, except of course in the case where alternative groups
attempt to usurp title from someone who is clearly still at home. Good
job Wayne.
Cheers,
James
--
James Couzens,
Programmer
-----------------------------------------------------------------
http://libspf.org -- ANSI C Sender Policy Framework library
http://libsrs.org -- ANSI C Sender Rewriting Scheme library
-----------------------------------------------------------------
PGP: http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0xBD3BF855
-------
Sender Policy Framework: http://spf.pobox.com/
Archives at http://archives.listbox.com/spf-discuss/current/
Send us money! http://spf.pobox.com/donations.html
To unsubscribe, change your address, or temporarily deactivate your
subscription,
please go to
http://v2.listbox.com/member/?listname=spf-discuss(_at_)v2(_dot_)listbox(_dot_)com
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part