wayne wrote:
There is *nothing* that libspf
does that libspf2 doesn't, and there are lots of things that libspf2
does that libspf doesn't.
Irrelevant. You don't name an independent project with a name that
implies it is a successor or follow-on to another project without that
developer's consent (or, I suppose, death). Full stop. Anything else
is assholistry.