As I have said I cannot think of a valid requirement to have an overly broad
spf record. There are many ways around this.
When you come up with a reason for the entire ip address space I will
concede. I have not seen a valid reason at this point.
----- Original Message -----
From: <rogerk(_at_)queernet(_dot_)org>
To: <spf-discuss(_at_)v2(_dot_)listbox(_dot_)com>
Cc: <spf-discuss(_at_)v2(_dot_)listbox(_dot_)com>
Sent: Wednesday, July 28, 2004 9:27 AM
Subject: Re: [spf-discuss] Re: Military
Quoting John Keown <jdk(_at_)nni(_dot_)com>:
It is not the clients ip address that at issue but the smtp server ip
address that is important. As long as the clients is connecting to the
domains smtp server the clients ip address is not relevant.
As long as you refuse to get it through your head that there are
legitimate and
well-informed reasons for clients to use SMTP servers that are not under
the
administration of the domain provider, this entire discussion is not
relevant.
-------
Sender Policy Framework: http://spf.pobox.com/
Archives at http://archives.listbox.com/spf-discuss/current/
Send us money! http://spf.pobox.com/donations.html
To unsubscribe, change your address, or temporarily deactivate your
subscription,
please go to
http://v2.listbox.com/member/?listname=spf-discuss(_at_)v2(_dot_)listbox(_dot_)com