On Sat, Jul 03, 2004 at 05:13:47AM +0200, Frank Ellermann wrote:
Once again thanks. The day before yesterday I tried to fix the
document using <base href="spf.pobox.com" /> (just by killing
all JS / inline style / valign / background stuff, whatever
was wrong should then be clear), but after an hour and in line
70 of about 400 I realized that "fixing" a page with a form
resulting in another page with the same form is futile... ;-)
Ah, that's pretty darn hard indeed :)
If you see an obvious way to test arbitrary sender policies
entered manually in the textarea for the result please add a
note how this is supposed to work. Otherwise use something
like disabled="disabled" or readonly="readonly" for the result:
I'm not sure what's better, my legacy browsers don't support
it, but the idea is probably to copy and paste the result (?)
Ok, I think this must somehow be possible, i'll bear this in mind.
I could also test your version with Lynx if that helps, there
are some subtle differences between "valid" and "visible with
any browser".
I've got lynx myself, so i'll probably check it out with that. However,
I strongly feel that a browser that doesn't display w3c compliant html
is not a browser anyway (or needs upgrading). Is lynx the browser that
can not view the wizard in your case??
Koen
--
K.F.J. Martens, Sonologic, http://www.sonologic.nl/
Networking, embedded systems, unix expertise, artificial intelligence.
Public PGP key: http://www.metro.cx/pubkey-gmc.asc
Wondering about the funny attachment your mail program
can't read? Visit http://www.openpgp.org/
-------
Sender Policy Framework: http://spf.pobox.com/
Archives at http://archives.listbox.com/spf-discuss/current/
Send us money! http://spf.pobox.com/donations.html
To unsubscribe, change your address, or temporarily deactivate your
subscription,
please go to
http://v2.listbox.com/member/?listname=spf-discuss(_at_)v2(_dot_)listbox(_dot_)com
pgpKcHFUriFWB.pgp
Description: PGP signature