On Thu, Jul 15, 2004 at 04:05:34PM +1000, Chris Drake wrote:
We are. Bayesian was here first, 4% of the world use "Netscape", so us
recommending ~all and choosing to ignore the fact that those filters
auto-spam-classify SPF headers means we're arrogantly throwing the
legit emails of SPF users into the trash cans of 4% of their
recipients (certainly ones using non compliant forwarding, maybe
others too depending on how their filter learned), without telling the
senders.
By the way, i have not seen any statistics on this. Is this really a big
problem?? Who uses bayesian filters, and experienced this problem? Can
this person quantify the problem??
Koen
--
K.F.J. Martens, Sonologic, http://www.sonologic.nl/
Networking, embedded systems, unix expertise, artificial intelligence.
Public PGP key: http://www.metro.cx/pubkey-gmc.asc
Wondering about the funny attachment your mail program
can't read? Visit http://www.openpgp.org/
-------
Sender Policy Framework: http://spf.pobox.com/
Archives at http://archives.listbox.com/spf-discuss/current/
Send us money! http://spf.pobox.com/donations.html
To unsubscribe, change your address, or temporarily deactivate your
subscription,
please go to
http://v2.listbox.com/member/?listname=spf-discuss(_at_)v2(_dot_)listbox(_dot_)com
pgpERrNjNxJmB.pgp
Description: PGP signature