I should have said to host a domain or mail server not own.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Michel Bouissou" <michel(_at_)bouissou(_dot_)net>
To: <spf-discuss(_at_)v2(_dot_)listbox(_dot_)com>
Sent: Saturday, July 24, 2004 10:26 AM
Subject: Re: [spf-discuss] SPF will solve spam and punish spammers
Le samedi 24 Juillet 2004 16:16, Roger B.A. Klorese a écrit :
I disagree totally about requirements to own a domain.
So do I.
That is absurd.
Your "minimum standards" turn this from a People's Medium into a
commercial exercise. Why not allow only a dozen media companies to own
them? After all, it works to your satisfaction, I'm sure, for radio and
television
And radio and T.V. are even more filled with commercials than email is
filled
with spam. For the greatest profit of companies that own them. But alas I
haven't yet found a version of SpamAssassin that would compile on my TV
set :-(
The idea of minimum standards for domain ownership, at a minimum, is
ridiculous
Completely ridiculous, but I believe the case to be hopeless, so I'm just
happy I have a nice .autoplonk file :-} and don't lose more time on such
bullshit.
--
Michel Bouissou <michel(_at_)bouissou(_dot_)net> OpenPGP ID 0xDDE8AC6E
-------
Sender Policy Framework: http://spf.pobox.com/
Archives at http://archives.listbox.com/spf-discuss/current/
Send us money! http://spf.pobox.com/donations.html
To unsubscribe, change your address, or temporarily deactivate your
subscription,
please go to
http://v2.listbox.com/member/?listname=spf-discuss(_at_)v2(_dot_)listbox(_dot_)com