"Stuart D. Gathman" <stuart(_at_)bmsi(_dot_)com> writes:
On Thu, 22 Jul 2004 spf(_at_)nevster(_dot_)net wrote:
Again, Meng, thank you for the pointers. My preference is strongly in
favour TMDA right now. Perhaps SPF can integrate with it somehow...
Please! Please! Please stop TMDA installations from sending their
stupid confirmation email for messages with SPF fail (i.e. that I
never sent)! [ ... ]
[ ... ]
But, if every TMDA installation would refrain from sending responses
for messages that fail SPF, then they could part of the solution instead
of part of the problem.
You should send this message to the tmda-users mailing list. Here's how
to find it:
http://tmda.net/lists/listinfo/
FYI: on my site, I reject SPF fail messages before TMDA gets invoked
at all. So I guess by your reckoning, I'm part of the solution. :)
On the tmda-users mailing list, we can discuss how to do this.
I'll be looking for your message there.
--
Lloyd Zusman
ljz(_at_)asfast(_dot_)com
God bless you.