spf-discuss
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Is SPF serving the best interests of the end-user?

2004-07-22 21:12:48
And here I was thinking I was actually reading the book...

        Nevin


On Jul 22, 2004, at 9:02 PM, Meng Weng Wong wrote:

On Thu, Jul 22, 2004 at 09:00:12PM -0700, spf(_at_)nevster(_dot_)net wrote:
|
| http://www.titankey.com : used several exclusive and absolute terms in
| describing their product, which induces a healthy skepticism.
| Logically, easily to refute.  Practically, has little useful meaning.
| Linguistically, implies and induces emotional context. In other words,
| I think they feel a little too strongly about themselves, and perhaps
| want others to feel that way too. Terms like "worlds first" "the only | product that..." "all other products..." are a sure way of invalidating
| a statement.  They do not use many terms that realistically describe
| amplitude, frequency, and duration; things that humans really need to
| communicate subjective ideas accurately.  Perhaps they've got a good
| product, but I think they communicate so poorly that I won't be finding
| out any time soon.  At the very least, I'm not inclined to trust what
| they say.
|


dude, are you judging a book by ts cover or by the way the
pages smell?  wait, that's not the smell of the pages,
that's the starbucks on the mezzanine ....

-------
Sender Policy Framework: http://spf.pobox.com/
Archives at http://archives.listbox.com/spf-discuss/current/
Send us money!  http://spf.pobox.com/donations.html
To unsubscribe, change your address, or temporarily deactivate your subscription, please go to http://v2.listbox.com/member/?listname=spf-discuss(_at_)v2(_dot_)listbox(_dot_)com