spf-discuss
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: mail administrator certification example

2004-07-30 08:57:20
Your spf record will not be resolved by the mail router correctly and will
result in an error. I am sorry that present systems - router will not
properly understand your notation.

Again if this is an acceptable form for spf then spf is doomed before it
gets off the ground.


Meng could you please chime in as to whether this is an acceptable form for
a spf record.


----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Andriy G. Tereshchenko" 
<spf-discuss(_at_)spam(_dot_)24(_dot_)odessa(_dot_)ua>
To: <spf-discuss(_at_)v2(_dot_)listbox(_dot_)com>
Sent: Friday, July 30, 2004 10:43 AM
Subject: Re: [spf-discuss] mail administrator certification example


v=spf1 ip4:216.65.64.1/24 ip4:216.65.3.1/24 a:send1.surgeweb.com mx -all

LOL
Do your IP/range validation requires .0 IP used? Why? Can you provide any
strong reasons for this? ;-)
JFYI, I would like to specify "Mail-OUT.Odessa.Net/24" in my SPF record -
because I trust my ISP ;-)
I do not wish to keep track of IPs assigned to Mail-OUT box by ISP box and
IP range assigned to ISP by RIPE.
There definitely will not be .0 IP for Mail-OUT box

Calm down. There must be certification/testing for software. Not for users
;-)

--
Andriy G. Tereshchenko
Odessa, Ukraine

-------
Sender Policy Framework: http://spf.pobox.com/
Archives at http://archives.listbox.com/spf-discuss/current/
Send us money!  http://spf.pobox.com/donations.html
To unsubscribe, change your address, or temporarily deactivate your
subscription,
please go to
http://v2.listbox.com/member/?listname=spf-discuss(_at_)v2(_dot_)listbox(_dot_)com