spf-discuss
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: *****SPAM***** Re: SPF is not usable as legal measure against spammers

2004-07-18 15:05:57

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Roger Moser" <roger_moser_spf(_at_)greenmail(_dot_)ch>
To: <spf-discuss(_at_)v2(_dot_)listbox(_dot_)com>
Sent: Saturday, July 17, 2004 3:35 AM
Subject: *****SPAM***** Re: [spf-discuss]SPF is not usable as legal measure
against spammers


administrator(_at_)yellowhead(_dot_)com wrote:

So for us, you will always get a reverse lookup that does not
correspond to the forward lookup.

For the 'ptr' mechanism to match the reverse lookup does not have to
correspond to the forward lookup, but the forward lookup has to correspond
to the reverse lookup.

Roger

Does it? Can you point to that in the spec, please?

Otherwise, J. Random mailhoster who has never published anything other than
a PTR and TXT record for outgoing.jrandomdomain.com,  must also create an A
record or an MX record for outgoing.jrandomain.com. In the DNS world, PTR's
can be published by domains and IP address ranges not owned by domain they
point to!