Mark Lentczner wrote:
the protocol doc was a -00 revision draft
Tnx for info, I didn't know the special rules for -00 drafts.
So I didn't confuse July 12 and 19, but draft -00 and -0x ;-)
She and I have already had a number of exchanges and we can
look forward to several refinements of language in the -01
draft.
Good, and as far as I can see it it should be possible to get
an unambiguous grammar (unlike say RfC 2822 with all its obs-
productions ;-)
this will be after IETF 60 on August 4th.
Okay. Maybe you could publish something like a working draft
when you're already interested in minor typos like spelling -
but at the moment the grammar is more important. Bye, Frank