Re: Are SPF fault tolerant ? How to make SPF records changed correctly ?

On Wed, Jul 14, 2004 at 01:49:44AM +0300, Andrew G. Tereschenko wrote:
> If they see that message is signed by valid DK (for my 
> user(_at_)mycompany(_dot_)com
> email) they will accept it for delivery, if not signed - check if I'm valid
> user and sign using key for client(_at_)ISP(_dot_)net email.
> No needs for open-relay. They relay only IP's of _their_ dial-up clients.
I am *NOT* going to install cryptographic software on my mta's. Of you want to 
advocate domain keys, you've come to the wrong place. This list is dedicated to 
discussion and rollout of SPF. I guess both have their pro's and con's, and if 
you look throught the archive of this list, you'll see those have been 
discussed before.

This is not the place to be complaining about how 'spf sucks' and 'domainkeys 
are the answer to all problems'. 

Koen

-- 
K.F.J. Martens, Sonologic, http://www.sonologic.nl/
Networking, embedded systems, unix expertise, artificial intelligence.
Public PGP key: http://www.metro.cx/pubkey-gmc.asc
Wondering about the funny attachment your mail program
can't read? Visit http://www.openpgp.org/

-------
Sender Policy Framework: http://spf.pobox.com/
Archives at http://archives.listbox.com/spf-discuss/current/
Send us money!  http://spf.pobox.com/donations.html
To unsubscribe, change your address, or temporarily deactivate your 
subscription, 
please go to 
http://v2.listbox.com/member/?listname=spf-discuss(_at_)v2(_dot_)listbox(_dot_)com

pgpNdyy6cuLvY.pgp
Description: PGP signature