"Meng Weng Wong" commented:
|
| version = "spf2." ver-minor "/" ver-scope *( "," ver-scope )
| ver-minor = 1*DIGIT
| ver-scope = "pra" / "mailfrom" / name
| name = alpha *( alpha / digit / "-" / "_" / "." )
|
| And the following stipulations:
|
| 1) "mailfrom" checking will be defined in a new draft
| 2) multiple records are allowed
| 3) a scope (e.g. "pra") can only appear in one record of one type for
| validity purposes
|
| The question before the working group: assuming no technical errors
| with the above, is there anybody who vehemently objects with this
| proposal?
|
perhaps someone could suggest on marid to allow "spf2.0/pra,mailfrom"
which is a compact way of saying
"spf2.0/pra ..."
"spf2.0/mailfrom ..."
I thought that's what was permitted by the *( "," ver-scope ) term.
also, i think we should do v=spf2.0
Standing for what? If it means 'all tests' there could be even more tests
defined in the future - giving a migration ambiguity.
BTW, if congratulations are in order, I offer them!
Chris