SPF Discuss (thread)
The pretty name,
Michel Py,
2004/09/29
- testing my subscription..., Anthony Ching, 2004/09/29
- Re: The pretty name, Carl Hutzler, 2004/09/30
- RE: The pretty name, Ryan Malayter, 2004/09/30
- RE: The pretty name, Ryan Malayter, 2004/09/30
- RE: The pretty name, Ryan Malayter, 2004/09/30
- RE: The pretty name, Ryan Malayter, 2004/09/30
RE: [SPFTAG] - RE: No use of checking RFC2822 headers - Sender is probably forged (SPF Softfail),
Stefan Engelbert,
2004/09/29
- Re: [SPFTAG] - RE: No use of checking RFC2822 headers - Sender is probably forged (SPF Softfail), Chris Haynes, 2004/09/29
- [SPFTAG] - RE: No use of checking RFC2822 headers - Sender is probably forged (SPF Softfail), Roger Moser, 2004/09/29
- RE: [SPFTAG] - RE: No use of checking RFC2822 headers - Sender is probably forged (SPF Softfail), terry, 2004/09/29
- Re: [SPFTAG] - RE: No use of checking RFC2822 headers - Sender is probably forged (SPF Softfail), jpinkerton, 2004/09/29
- Re: [SPFTAG] - RE: No use of checking RFC2822 headers - Sender is probably forged (SPF Softfail), jamesp, 2004/09/30
- RE: [SPFTAG] - RE: No use of checking RFC2822 headers - Sender is probably forged (SPF Softfail), Stefan Engelbert, 2004/09/29
Hi,
Şamil TEMEL,
2004/09/29
- Re: Hi, Paul Howarth, 2004/09/29
No use of checking RFC2822 headers,
Roger Moser,
2004/09/28
- No use of checking RFC2822 headers, Roger Moser, 2004/09/28
- Re: No use of checking RFC2822 headers, Carl Hutzler, 2004/09/28
- Re: No use of checking RFC2822 headers, Alan Hodgson, 2004/09/28
- Re: No use of checking RFC2822 headers, wayne, 2004/09/28
- Re: No use of checking RFC2822 headers, jmacdonald, 2004/09/28
- Re: No use of checking RFC2822 headers, Carl Hutzler, 2004/09/28
- Re: No use of checking RFC2822 headers, jmacdonald, 2004/09/29
- Re: No use of checking RFC2822 headers, Carl Hutzler, 2004/09/29
- Re: No use of checking RFC2822 headers, Raymond Neeves, 2004/09/30
- RE: No use of checking RFC2822 headers, Michel Py, 2004/09/28
- No use of checking RFC2822 headers, Roger Moser, 2004/09/28
- RE: No use of checking RFC2822 headers, Michel Py, 2004/09/28
- RE: No use of checking RFC2822 headers, Michel Py, 2004/09/28
- Re: No use of checking RFC2822 headers, Graham Murray, 2004/09/28
- Re: No use of checking RFC2822 headers, Carl Hutzler, 2004/09/29
- RE: No use of checking RFC2822 headers, Scott Kitterman, 2004/09/29
- RE: No use of checking RFC2822 headers, David Brodbeck, 2004/09/29
- Re: No use of checking RFC2822 headers, Carl Hutzler, 2004/09/29
- RE: No use of checking RFC2822 headers, terry, 2004/09/29
- Re: No use of checking RFC2822 headers, Hector Santos, 2004/09/29
- Re: No use of checking RFC2822 headers, Paul Howarth, 2004/09/29
- Re: No use of checking RFC2822 headers, Hector Santos, 2004/09/29
- RE: No use of checking RFC2822 headers, terry, 2004/09/29
- Re: No use of checking RFC2822 headers, Nico Kadel-Garcia, 2004/09/30
- RE: No use of checking RFC2822 headers, Michel Py, 2004/09/29
- RE: No use of checking RFC2822 headers, Scott Kitterman, 2004/09/29
- RE: No use of checking RFC2822 headers, Ryan Malayter, 2004/09/29
- RE: No use of checking RFC2822 headers, Michel Py, 2004/09/29
draft: SPF community's position on MARID closing,
Meng Weng Wong,
2004/09/24
- Re: draft: SPF community's position on MARID closing, Chuck Mead, 2004/09/24
- Re: draft: SPF community's position on MARID closing, Jonathan Gardner, 2004/09/24
- Re: draft: SPF community's position on MARID closing, Anne P. Mitchell, Esq. <amitchell(_at_)isipp(_dot_)com>, 2004/09/24
- Re: draft: SPF community's position on MARID closing, Frank Ellermann, 2004/09/24
- RE: draft: SPF community's position on MARID closing, John Glube, 2004/09/24
- Re: draft: SPF community's position on MARID closing, Anne P. Mitchell, Esq. <amitchell(_at_)isipp(_dot_)com>, 2004/09/25
- RE: draft: SPF community's position on MARID closing, John Glube, 2004/09/25
- RE: draft: SPF community's position on MARID closing, John Glube, 2004/09/25
- Re: draft: SPF community's position on MARID closing, wayne, 2004/09/24
- Re: draft: SPF community's position on MARID closing, wayne, 2004/09/24
- Re: draft: SPF community's position on MARID closing, Jonathan Gardner, 2004/09/24
- Re: draft: SPF community's position on MARID closing, wayne, 2004/09/24
- Re: draft: SPF community's position on MARID closing, Meng Weng Wong, 2004/09/24
- Re: draft: SPF community's position on MARID closing, william(at)elan.net, 2004/09/24
- Re: draft: SPF community's position on MARID closing, Anne P. Mitchell, Esq. <amitchell(_at_)isipp(_dot_)com>, 2004/09/24
- Re: draft: SPF community's position on MARID closing, wayne, 2004/09/25
- Re: draft: SPF community's position on MARID closing, Frank Ellermann, 2004/09/24
- Trying to specify SPF Classic? (Was: draft: SPF community's position on MARID closing, Stephane Bortzmeyer, 2004/09/26
moving on from MARID,
Meng Weng Wong,
2004/09/24
- Re: moving on from MARID, Meng Weng Wong, 2004/09/24
- RE: moving on from MARID, Scott Kitterman, 2004/09/24
- Re: moving on from MARID, william(at)elan.net, 2004/09/24
- Re: moving on from MARID, Alan Hodgson, 2004/09/24
- Re: moving on from MARID, wayne, 2004/09/24
- Re: moving on from MARID, Greg Connor, 2004/09/24
- Re: moving on from MARID, Meng Weng Wong, 2004/09/25
- Re: moving on from MARID, Tony Finch, 2004/09/25
- Re: moving on from MARID, wayne, 2004/09/25
- Re: moving on from MARID, Mark, 2004/09/26
- Re: moving on from MARID, Mark Shewmaker, 2004/09/29
- Moving forward, Mark Lentczner, 2004/09/29
- Re: Moving forward, william(at)elan.net, 2004/09/29
- What is "Unified SPF"? (Was: Moving forward, Stephane Bortzmeyer, 2004/09/30
- Re: Moving forward, wayne, 2004/09/29
- Re: Moving forward, william(at)elan.net, 2004/09/30
- Re: Moving forward, wayne, 2004/09/30
- Re: Moving forward, Chuck Mead, 2004/09/30
- Re: Moving forward, Frank Ellermann, 2004/09/30
- Re: Moving forward, Koen Martens, 2004/09/30
- Re: Moving forward, Stephane Bortzmeyer, 2004/09/30
- Re: moving on from MARID, Mark Shewmaker, 2004/09/28
- Re: moving on from MARID, Mark, 2004/09/28
- Re: moving on from MARID, Mark Shewmaker, 2004/09/29
- RE: moving on from MARID, Scott Kitterman, 2004/09/29
- Unified SPF Algorithm (was: moving on from MARID), william(at)elan.net, 2004/09/29
- Re: Unified SPF Algorithm (was: moving on from MARID), william(at)elan.net, 2004/09/29
- Re: Unified SPF Algorithm (was: moving on from MARID), Hector Santos, 2004/09/29
- Re: Unified SPF Algorithm (was: moving on from MARID), william(at)elan.net, 2004/09/29
- Re: Unified SPF Algorithm (was: moving on from MARID), Hector Santos, 2004/09/30
- Re: Unified SPF Algorithm (was: moving on from MARID), Stephane Bortzmeyer, 2004/09/30
- Re: Unified SPF Algorithm (was: moving on from MARID), Stephane Bortzmeyer, 2004/09/30
- Re: moving on from MARID, wayne, 2004/09/25
- Re: moving on from MARID, Greg Connor, 2004/09/25
- RE: moving on from MARID, Seth Goodman, 2004/09/26
- Re: moving on from MARID, Frank Ellermann, 2004/09/24
- Re: moving on from MARID, Anne P. Mitchell, Esq. <amitchell(_at_)isipp(_dot_)com>, 2004/09/24
- Checking all identities or letting people choose (Was: moving on from MARID, Stephane Bortzmeyer, 2004/09/26
- Separating authentication and reputation (Was: moving on from MARID, Stephane Bortzmeyer, 2004/09/26
- RE: moving on from MARID, Michel Py, 2004/09/24
- RE: moving on from MARID, Michel Py, 2004/09/25
- moving on from MARID, Roger Moser, 2004/09/25
- RE: moving on from MARID, Michel Py, 2004/09/27
Look at that patent application again,
Holm, Mark,
2004/09/23
- SPF With domain hosting, phil, 2004/09/23
- Message not available
- Re: SPF With domain hosting, Len Conrad, 2004/09/23
- Re: SPF With domain hosting, Dale Ghent, 2004/09/23
- Re: SPF With domain hosting, Len Conrad, 2004/09/23
- Re: SPF With domain hosting, Koen Martens, 2004/09/24
- Re: SPF With domain hosting, Rodolfo Sikora, 2004/09/24
- Re: SPF With domain hosting, Joe Rhett, 2004/09/29
- Re: SPF With domain hosting, Koen Martens, 2004/09/24
- Re: Look at that patent application again, Paul Howarth, 2004/09/24
- Re: Look at that patent application again, Holm, Mark, 2004/09/24
- Re: Look at that patent application again, Holm, Mark, 2004/09/24
RE: Disappointed, yet..not surprised (was Re: Disap pointed),
Hallam-Baker, Phillip,
2004/09/23
- Re: Disappointed, yet..not surprised (was Re: Disap pointed), Chip Mefford, 2004/09/23
- RE: Disappointed, yet..not surprised (was Re: Disap pointed), william(at)elan.net, 2004/09/23
- RE: Disappointed, yet..not surprised (was Re: Disap pointed), guy, 2004/09/23
- RE: Disappointed, yet..not surprised (was Re: Disap pointed), Seth Goodman, 2004/09/23
- Re: Disappointed, yet..not surprised, Graham Murray, 2004/09/24
- Re: Disappointed, yet..not surprised, Mark, 2004/09/24
- Re: Disappointed, yet..not surprised, Anne P. Mitchell, Esq. <amitchell(_at_)isipp(_dot_)com>, 2004/09/24
- RE: Disappointed, yet..not surprised, John Glube, 2004/09/24
- Re: Disappointed, yet..not surprised, Lloyd Zusman, 2004/09/24
- Re: Re: Disappointed, yet..not surprised, Anne P. Mitchell, Esq. <amitchell(_at_)isipp(_dot_)com>, 2004/09/25
- RE: Re: Disappointed, yet..not surprised, John Glube, 2004/09/25
- Re: Disappointed, yet..not surprised, Nico Kadel-Garcia, 2004/09/25
- RE: Disappointed, yet..not surprised, John Glube, 2004/09/25
- Re: Disappointed, yet..not surprised (was Re: Disap pointed), Kevin Peuhkurinen, 2004/09/23
- RE: Disappointed, yet..not surprised (was Re: Disap pointed), Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 2004/09/23
- RE: Disappointed, yet..not surprised (was Re: Disap pointed), Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 2004/09/24
- RE: Disappointed, yet..not surprised (was Re: Disap pointed), Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 2004/09/24
- Re: Disappointed, yet..not surprised (was Re: Disap pointed), Michael Hammer, 2004/09/24
- Re: Disappointed, yet..not surprised (was Re: Disap pointed), Chuck Mead, 2004/09/24
- Re: Disappointed, yet..not surprised (was Re: Disap pointed), Anne P. Mitchell, Esq. <amitchell(_at_)isipp(_dot_)com>, 2004/09/24
- Re: Disappointed, yet..not surprised (was Re: Disap pointed), Nick Phillips, 2004/09/24
RE: Disappointed, yet..not surprised (was Re: Disap pointed),
Hallam-Baker, Phillip,
2004/09/23
- Re: Disappointed, yet..not surprised (was Re: Disap pointed), Chuck Mead, 2004/09/23
- Re: Disappointed, yet..not surprised (was Re: Disap pointed), Stuart D. Gathman, 2004/09/23
- Re: Disappointed, yet..not surprised (was Re: Disap pointed), David Woodhouse, 2004/09/23
- Re: Disappointed, yet..not surprised (was Re: Disap pointed), Anne P. Mitchell, Esq. <amitchell(_at_)isipp(_dot_)com>, 2004/09/23
- Re: Disappointed, yet..not surprised (was Re: Disap pointed), John Hinton, 2004/09/23
- Re: Disappointed, yet..not surprised (was Re: Disap pointed), Meng Weng Wong, 2004/09/23
- Re: Disappointed, yet..not surprised (was Re: Disap pointed), Jason Gurtz, 2004/09/23
- Re: Disappointed, yet..not surprised (was Re: Disap pointed), Jason Gurtz, 2004/09/23
- Re: Disappointed, yet..not surprised (was Re: Disap pointed), John Hinton, 2004/09/23
- Re: Disappointed, yet..not surprised (was Re: Disap pointed), Chuck Mead, 2004/09/23
- Re: Disappointed, yet..not surprised (was Re: Disap pointed), Meng Weng Wong, 2004/09/23
- Re: Disappointed, yet..not surprised (was Re: Disap pointed), John Hinton, 2004/09/23
- Re: Disappointed, yet..not surprised (was Re: Disap pointed), Chuck Mead, 2004/09/23
- Re: Disappointed, yet..not surprised (was Re: Disap pointed), Chuck Mead, 2004/09/26
- Re: Disappointed, yet..not surprised (was Re: Disap pointed), Anne P. Mitchell, Esq. <amitchell(_at_)isipp(_dot_)com>, 2004/09/23
- Re: Disappointed, yet..not surprised (was Re: Disap pointed), Chuck Mead, 2004/09/23
- Re: Disappointed, yet..not surprised (was Re: Disap pointed), Michael Hammer, 2004/09/24
- Re: Disappointed, yet..not surprised (was Re: Disap pointed), Chuck Mead, 2004/09/24
- Re: Disappointed, yet..not surprised (was Re: Disap pointed), Michael Hammer, 2004/09/24
- Re: Disappointed, yet..not surprised (was Re: Disap pointed), Chuck Mead, 2004/09/24
- Two reasons why software patents are bad, Stuart D. Gathman, 2004/09/24
- Re: Two reasons why software patents are bad, Michael Hammer, 2004/09/26
- Re: Two reasons why software patents are bad, Stuart D. Gathman, 2004/09/26
- Re: Two reasons why software patents are bad, Len Conrad, 2004/09/27
- Re: Two reasons why software patents are bad, Stuart D. Gathman, 2004/09/27
- Re: Two reasons why software patents are bad, Hector Santos, 2004/09/27
- Re: Two reasons why software patents are bad, Len Conrad, 2004/09/27
- Re: Two reasons why software patents are bad, Hector Santos, 2004/09/27
- Re: Two reasons why software patents are bad, jpinkerton, 2004/09/28
- Re: Disappointed, yet..not surprised (was Re: Disap pointed), Anne P. Mitchell, Esq. <amitchell(_at_)isipp(_dot_)com>, 2004/09/23
- Re: Disappointed, yet..not surprised (was Re: Disap pointed), Koen Martens, 2004/09/23
- RE: Disappointed, yet..not surprised (was Re: Disap pointed), Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 2004/09/23
draft-ietf-marid-protocol-03 (was: New Drafts),
Frank Ellermann,
2004/09/22
- Re: draft-ietf-marid-protocol-03 (was: New Drafts), william(at)elan.net, 2004/09/22
- Re: draft-ietf-marid-protocol-03, Frank Ellermann, 2004/09/23
- Re: Re: draft-ietf-marid-protocol-03, Andrew W . Donoho, 2004/09/23
- Re: draft-ietf-marid-protocol-03, Frank Ellermann, 2004/09/23
- Re: Re: draft-ietf-marid-protocol-03, Greg Connor, 2004/09/23
- Re: Re: draft-ietf-marid-protocol-03, Koen Martens, 2004/09/24
- Re: Re: draft-ietf-marid-protocol-03, Chuck Mead, 2004/09/24
- Re: Re: draft-ietf-marid-protocol-03, Commerco WebMaster, 2004/09/24
- Re: Re: draft-ietf-marid-protocol-03, Koen Martens, 2004/09/24
- Re: draft-ietf-marid-protocol-03, Frank Ellermann, 2004/09/24
- Re: Re: draft-ietf-marid-protocol-03, Koen Martens, 2004/09/26
- Re: Re: draft-ietf-marid-protocol-03, jpinkerton, 2004/09/26
- Re: Re: draft-ietf-marid-protocol-03, Koen Martens, 2004/09/26
- Re: Re: draft-ietf-marid-protocol-03, jpinkerton, 2004/09/26
- Re: Re: draft-ietf-marid-protocol-03, Stuart D. Gathman, 2004/09/26
- Re: Re: draft-ietf-marid-protocol-03 - scope questions and comments, Commerco WebMaster, 2004/09/26
- Re: Re: draft-ietf-marid-protocol-03 - scope questions and comments, Koen Martens, 2004/09/28
- Re: Re: draft-ietf-marid-protocol-03 - scope questions and comments, Commerco WebMaster, 2004/09/28
- Re: Re: draft-ietf-marid-protocol-03 - scope questions and comments, Greg Connor, 2004/09/29
- Re: draft-ietf-marid-protocol-03 - scope questions and comments, Roger Moser, 2004/09/30
- Re: Re: draft-ietf-marid-protocol-03 - scope questions and comments, william(at)elan.net, 2004/09/30
- Re: Re: draft-ietf-marid-protocol-03 - scope questions and comments, wayne, 2004/09/30
- Re: Re: draft-ietf-marid-protocol-03 - scope questions and comments, Commerco WebMaster, 2004/09/30
- Re: Re: draft-ietf-marid-protocol-03 - scope questions and comments, william(at)elan.net, 2004/09/30
- Re: Re: draft-ietf-marid-protocol-03, David, 2004/09/24
- Re: Re: draft-ietf-marid-protocol-03, william(at)elan.net, 2004/09/23
- Re: draft-ietf-marid-protocol-03, Frank Ellermann, 2004/09/23
- Re: Re: draft-ietf-marid-protocol-03, Mark Shewmaker, 2004/09/23
- Re: draft-ietf-marid-protocol-03, Frank Ellermann, 2004/09/24
- Re: Re: draft-ietf-marid-protocol-03, Tony Finch, 2004/09/24
- Resent-* (was: draft-ietf-marid-protocol-03), Frank Ellermann, 2004/09/24
- Re: Resent-*, Graham Murray, 2004/09/24
- Re: Resent-*, John A. Martin, 2004/09/25
- Re: Re: Resent-*, william(at)elan.net, 2004/09/25
- Re: Resent-* (was: draft-ietf-marid-protocol-03), Tony Finch, 2004/09/25
- Re: Resent-*, Frank Ellermann, 2004/09/27
- Re: Re: Resent-*, Tony Finch, 2004/09/28
- RE: Re: Resent-*, Seth Goodman, 2004/09/28
- RE: Re: Resent-*, Tony Finch, 2004/09/29
- Re: Resent-* (was: draft-ietf-marid-protocol-03), Stuart D. Gathman, 2004/09/26
- Re: Resent-*, Frank Ellermann, 2004/09/27
Is SPF Authenication or Authorization?,
jmacdonald,
2004/09/21
- Re: Is SPF Authenication or Authorization?, Peter Bowyer, 2004/09/21
- Re: Is SPF Authenication or Authorization?, Mark, 2004/09/21
- Re: Is SPF Authenication or Authorization?, Meng Weng Wong, 2004/09/21
- Re: Is SPF Authenication or Authorization?, Dave Crocker, 2004/09/21
- Re: Is SPF Authenication or Authorization?, Mark, 2004/09/21
- Re: Is SPF Authenication or Authorization?, Stuart D. Gathman, 2004/09/21
- Re: Is SPF Authenication or Authorization?, Alex van den Bogaerdt, 2004/09/21
- Re: Is SPF Authenication or Authorization?, Meng Weng Wong, 2004/09/21
- Re: Is SPF Authenication or Authorization?, Alex van den Bogaerdt, 2004/09/21
- Re: Is SPF Authenication or Authorization?, Steve Meyers, 2004/09/21
- Re: Is SPF Authenication or Authorization?, Meng Weng Wong, 2004/09/21
- Re: Is SPF Authenication or Authorization?, Mark, 2004/09/21
- Re: Is SPF Authenication or Authorization?, Dave Crocker, 2004/09/22
- Re: Is SPF Authenication or Authorization?, Mark, 2004/09/22
- Re: Is SPF Authenication or Authorization?, Dave Crocker, 2004/09/22
- Re: Is SPF Authenication or Authorization?, Mark, 2004/09/22
- Re: Is SPF Authenication or Authorization?, Theo Schlossnagle, 2004/09/23
- Re: Is SPF Authenication or Authorization?, Tony Finch, 2004/09/23
- RE: Is SPF Authenication or Authorization?, Scott Kitterman, 2004/09/23
- Re: Is SPF Authenication or Authorization?, Alex van den Bogaerdt, 2004/09/21
- Re: Is SPF Authenication or Authorization?, Ralf Doeblitz, 2004/09/22
- Is SPF Authenication or Authorization?, Roger Moser, 2004/09/21
- Re: Is SPF Authenication or Authorization?, Dave Crocker, 2004/09/22
- RE: Is SPF Authenication or Authorization?, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 2004/09/21
Article on Microsoft patents and Caller ID,
william(at)elan.net,
2004/09/21
- RE: Article on Microsoft patents and Caller ID, guy, 2004/09/21
- Re: Article on Microsoft patents and Caller ID, Rodolfo Sikora, 2004/09/21
- RE: Article on Microsoft patents and Caller ID, william(at)elan.net, 2004/09/21
- Re: Article on Microsoft patents and Caller ID, Meng Weng Wong, 2004/09/21
- Re: Article on Microsoft patents and Caller ID, Chuck Mead, 2004/09/21
- Re: Article on Microsoft patents and Caller ID, Meng Weng Wong, 2004/09/21
- Re: Article on Microsoft patents and Caller ID, Anne P. Mitchell, Esq. <amitchell(_at_)isipp(_dot_)com>, 2004/09/21
- Re: Article on Microsoft patents and Caller ID, David, 2004/09/22
- Re: Article on Microsoft patents and Caller ID, Frank Ellermann, 2004/09/22
- RE: Article on Microsoft patents and Caller ID, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 2004/09/22
[aspen] Notes from the crystal ball: authentication vs policy, MTA vs MUA,
Meng Weng Wong,
2004/09/18
- Re: [aspen] Notes from the crystal ball: authentication vs policy, MTA vs MUA, Anne P. Mitchell, Esq., 2004/09/18
- defining reputation and accreditation., Meng Weng Wong, 2004/09/19
- Re: defining reputation and accreditation., Mark C. Langston, 2004/09/19
- Re: defining reputation and accreditation., Anne P. Mitchell, Esq., 2004/09/20
- Re: defining reputation and accreditation., John A. Martin, 2004/09/20
- Re: defining reputation and accreditation., Anne P. Mitchell, Esq., 2004/09/20
Re: "include" directive in -03 SPF draft,
Meng Weng Wong,
2004/09/16
- Re: "include" directive in -03 SPF draft, Daniel Quinlan, 2004/09/17
- Re: "include" directive in -03 SPF draft, Stephane Bortzmeyer, 2004/09/17
- RE: Re: "include" directive in -03 SPF draft, Scott Kitterman, 2004/09/17
- Please Don't Reject SPF NEUTRAL, Scott Kitterman, 2004/09/17
- RE: Please Don't Reject SPF NEUTRAL, guy, 2004/09/17
- RE: Please Don't Reject SPF NEUTRAL, Scott Kitterman, 2004/09/17
- Re: Please Don't Reject SPF NEUTRAL, David Brodbeck, 2004/09/17
- Re: Please Don't Reject SPF NEUTRAL, Mark Shewmaker, 2004/09/17
- Re: Please Don't Reject SPF NEUTRAL, Jonathan Gardner, 2004/09/17
- RE: Please Don't Reject SPF NEUTRAL, Scott Kitterman, 2004/09/17
- RE: Please Don't Reject SPF NEUTRAL, guy, 2004/09/17
- Re: Please Don't Reject SPF NEUTRAL, David Brodbeck, 2004/09/17
- Re: Please Don't Reject SPF NEUTRAL, Jonathan Gardner, 2004/09/17
- Re: Please Don't Reject SPF NEUTRAL, Frank Ellermann, 2004/09/18
- RE: Re: Please Don't Reject SPF NEUTRAL, Scott Kitterman, 2004/09/20
- Re: Re: Please Don't Reject SPF NEUTRAL, Mark, 2004/09/20
- RE: Re: Please Don't Reject SPF NEUTRAL, Scott Kitterman, 2004/09/20
- Re: Re: Please Don't Reject SPF NEUTRAL, Mark, 2004/09/20
- Re: Please Don't Reject SPF NEUTRAL, Frank Ellermann, 2004/09/23
Re: FW: Microsoft's Updated Statement about IPR Claimed in <draft-ietf-marid-core-03.txt> and <draft-ietf-marid-pra-00.txt> in Combination,
william(at)elan.net,
2004/09/16
- Re: Microsoft's Updated Statement about IPR Claimed in <draft-ietf-marid-core-03.txt> and <draft-ietf-marid-pra-00.txt> in Combination, Andrew Newton, 2004/09/16
- Re: Microsoft's Updated Statement about IPR Claimed in <draft-ietf-marid-core-03.txt> and <draft-ietf-marid-pra-00.txt> in Combination, william(at)elan.net, 2004/09/16
- RE: Re: Microsoft's Updated Statement about IPR Claimed in <draft-ietf-marid-core-03.txt> and <draft-ietf-marid-pra-00.txt> in Combination, Seth Goodman, 2004/09/16
- Re: Re: Microsoft's Updated Statement about IPR Claimed in <draft-ietf-marid-core-03.txt> and <draft-ietf-marid-pra-00.txt> in Combination, Anne P. Mitchell, Esq., 2004/09/16
- RE: Re: Microsoft's Updated Statement about IPR Claimed in <draft-ietf-marid-core-03.txt> and <draft-ietf-marid-pra-00.txt> in Combination, Seth Goodman, 2004/09/16
- Re: SPF covered by Microsoft Patent App (was Re: Microsoft's Updated Statement about IPR Claimed in <draft-ietf-marid-core-03.txt> and <draft-ietf-marid-pra-00.txt> in Combination), Anne P. Mitchell, Esq., 2004/09/16
- Re: Re: Microsoft's Updated Statement about IPR Claimed in <draft-ietf-marid-core-03.txt> and <draft-ietf-marid-pra-00.txt> in Combination, Nico Kadel-Garcia, 2004/09/16
- RE: Re: Microsoft's Updated Statement about IPR Claimed in <draft-ietf-marid-core-03.txt> and <draft-ietf-marid-pra-00.txt> in Combination, william(at)elan.net, 2004/09/16
- RE: Re: Microsoft's Updated Statement about IPR Claimed in <draft-ietf-marid-core-03.txt> and <draft-ietf-marid-pra-00.txt> in Combination, Seth Goodman, 2004/09/16
- Patent Application 683624, Meng Weng Wong, 2004/09/16
- Re: FW: Microsoft's Updated Statement about IPR Claimed in <draft-ietf-marid-core-03.txt> and <draft-ietf-marid-pra-00.txt> in Combination, Holm, Mark, 2004/09/16
- Re: FW: Microsoft's Updated Statement about IPR Claimed in <draft-ietf-marid-core-03.txt> and <draft-ietf-marid-pra-00.txt> in Combination, Holm, Mark, 2004/09/16
SPF-compliant phishing?,
David Woodhouse,
2004/09/15
- Re: SPF-compliant phishing?, Daniel Taylor, 2004/09/15
- SPF-compliant phishing?, Roger Moser, 2004/09/15
- Re: SPF-compliant phishing?, Daniel Taylor, 2004/09/15
- RE: SPF-compliant phishing?, guy, 2004/09/15
- Re: SPF-compliant phishing?, David Woodhouse, 2004/09/15
- Re: SPF-compliant phishing?, Daniel Taylor, 2004/09/15
- Re: SPF-compliant phishing?, David Woodhouse, 2004/09/15
- Re: SPF-compliant phishing?, Stuart D. Gathman, 2004/09/15
- Re: SPF-compliant phishing?, David Woodhouse, 2004/09/15
- Re: SPF-compliant phishing?, Tony Finch, 2004/09/15
- Re: SPF-compliant phishing?, Daniel Taylor, 2004/09/15
- Re: SPF-compliant phishing?, David Woodhouse, 2004/09/15
- Re: SPF-compliant phishing?, Rik van Riel, 2004/09/15
- Re: SPF-compliant phishing?, David Woodhouse, 2004/09/15
- RE: SPF-compliant phishing?, guy, 2004/09/15
- RE: SPF-compliant phishing?, Seth Goodman, 2004/09/15
- RE: SPF-compliant phishing?, Rik van Riel, 2004/09/15
- RE: SPF-compliant phishing?, Seth Goodman, 2004/09/15
- RE: SPF-compliant phishing?, Stuart D. Gathman, 2004/09/15
- RE: SPF-compliant phishing?, David Woodhouse, 2004/09/15
- RE: SPF-compliant phishing?, David Woodhouse, 2004/09/15
- Re: SPF-compliant phishing?, Meng Weng Wong, 2004/09/16
- RE: SPF-compliant phishing?, Seth Goodman, 2004/09/16
- Re: SPF-compliant phishing?, Stuart D. Gathman, 2004/09/16
- SPF-compliant phishing?, Roger Moser, 2004/09/15
- Re: SPF-compliant phishing?, David Woodhouse, 2004/09/15
- Re: SPF-compliant phishing?, Jonathan Gardner, 2004/09/15
- Re: SPF-compliant phishing?, David Woodhouse, 2004/09/15
- Re: SPF-compliant phishing?, Jonathan Gardner, 2004/09/15
- Re: SPF-compliant phishing?, David Woodhouse, 2004/09/15
- RE: SPF-compliant phishing?, Guy, 2004/09/15
- Re: SPF-compliant phishing?, Jonathan Gardner, 2004/09/16
- RE: SPF-compliant phishing?, Scott Kitterman, 2004/09/16
- RE: SPF-compliant phishing?, Stuart D. Gathman, 2004/09/16
- RE: SPF-compliant phishing?, Scott Kitterman, 2004/09/16
- RE: SPF-compliant phishing?, Tony Finch, 2004/09/17
- RE: SPF-compliant phishing?, Scott Kitterman, 2004/09/17
- Re: SPF-compliant phishing?, Alan Batie, 2004/09/18
- Re: SPF-compliant phishing?, Paul Ficinski, 2004/09/18
- Re: SPF-compliant phishing?, Alan Batie, 2004/09/18
- Re: SPF-compliant phishing?, John A. Martin, 2004/09/18
- Re: SPF-compliant phishing?, Stuart D. Gathman, 2004/09/19
- RE: SPF-compliant phishing?, guy, 2004/09/16
- RE: SPF-compliant phishing?, David Woodhouse, 2004/09/17
- Re: SPF-compliant phishing?, Stuart D. Gathman, 2004/09/16
- Re: SPF-compliant phishing?, David Woodhouse, 2004/09/17
- Re: SPF-compliant phishing?, Nico Kadel-Garcia, 2004/09/17
- Re: SPF-compliant phishing?, David Woodhouse, 2004/09/18
- Re: SPF-compliant phishing?, Nico Kadel-Garcia, 2004/09/21
- Re: SPF-compliant phishing?, Tony Finch, 2004/09/21
- Re: SPF-compliant phishing?, Nico Kadel-Garcia, 2004/09/21
- Re: SPF-compliant phishing?, Mike Markley, 2004/09/19
- Re: SPF-compliant phishing?, Koen Martens, 2004/09/20
- Re: SPF-compliant phishing?, Stuart D. Gathman, 2004/09/19
Re: HELO and Unified,
Meng Weng Wong,
2004/09/14
- Re: Re: HELO and Unified, Marc Kool, 2004/09/14
- Re: Re: HELO and Unified, Paul Bissex, 2004/09/15
- Re: Re: HELO and Unified, Stuart D. Gathman, 2004/09/15
- Re: Re: HELO and Unified, David Brodbeck, 2004/09/15
- RE: Re: HELO and Unified, guy, 2004/09/15
- Re: Re: HELO and Unified, Alan Hodgson, 2004/09/15
- Re: Re: HELO and Unified, David Brodbeck, 2004/09/15
- RE: Re: HELO and Unified, Stuart D. Gathman, 2004/09/15
- RE: Re: HELO and Unified, guy, 2004/09/15
- RE: Re: HELO and Unified, Seth Goodman, 2004/09/15
- Re: HELO and Unified, william(at)elan.net, 2004/09/15
- Re: Re: HELO and Unified, Holm, Mark, 2004/09/15
MARID Co-Chairs Clarify Concensus Statement,
csm,
2004/09/13
- Re: MARID Co-Chairs Clarify Concensus Statement, Guillaume Filion, 2004/09/13
- Re: MARID Co-Chairs Clarify Concensus Statement, Chuck Mead, 2004/09/13
- Re: MARID Co-Chairs Clarify Concensus Statement, Guillaume Filion, 2004/09/13
- Re: MARID Co-Chairs Clarify Concensus Statement, Chuck Mead, 2004/09/14
- Re: MARID Co-Chairs Clarify Concensus Statement, Douglas K. Fischer, 2004/09/14
- txt SPF record with cname, guy, 2004/09/13
- Re: txt SPF record with cname, Stuart D. Gathman, 2004/09/13
- RE: txt SPF record with cname, guy, 2004/09/13
- Re: txt SPF record with cname, Graham Murray, 2004/09/14
- Re: txt SPF record with cname, Koen Martens, 2004/09/14
- Re: txt SPF record with cname, Graham Murray, 2004/09/14
- Re: txt SPF record with cname, Alex van den Bogaerdt, 2004/09/14
- RE: txt SPF record with cname, Scott Kitterman, 2004/09/14
- Re: txt SPF record with cname, Stuart D. Gathman, 2004/09/14
- RE: txt SPF record with cname, Guy, 2004/09/14
- Re: txt SPF record with cname, Alex van den Bogaerdt, 2004/09/14
Concerns on SPF Unified,
Jonathan Gardner,
2004/09/10
- Re: SPF adoptees, John Keown, 2004/09/10
- Re: SPF adoptees, Daniel Taylor, 2004/09/10
- RE: SPF adoptees, Scott Kitterman, 2004/09/10
- Re: SPF adoptees, John Keown, 2004/09/10
- Re: SPF adoptees, Paul Howarth, 2004/09/10
- Re: SPF adoptees, Stuart D. Gathman, 2004/09/10
- Re: SPF adoptees, Anne P. Mitchell, Esq., 2004/09/10
- RE: SPF adoptees, Seth Goodman, 2004/09/11
- RE: SPF adoptees, Anne P. Mitchell, 2004/09/11
- RE: SPF adoptees, william(at)elan.net, 2004/09/12
- Re: SPF adoptees, Frank Ellermann, 2004/09/12
- Re: SPF adoptees, Anne P. Mitchell, Esq., 2004/09/12
- Re: SPF adoptees, michael, 2004/09/13
- RE: SPF adoptees, Shoaib, 2004/09/13
- Re: SPF adoptees, John Keown, 2004/09/10
- Re: SPF adoptees, Alan Hodgson, 2004/09/10
- Re: SPF adoptees, Meng Weng Wong, 2004/09/10
- Re: SPF adoptees, Jonathan Gardner, 2004/09/10
- Re: Concerns on SPF Unified, Frank Ellermann, 2004/09/10
- RE: Re: Concerns on SPF Unified, Seth Goodman, 2004/09/10
- Re: Concerns on SPF Unified, Frank Ellermann, 2004/09/10
- RE: Re: Concerns on SPF Unified, Seth Goodman, 2004/09/11
- RE: Re: Concerns on SPF Unified, Scott Kitterman, 2004/09/11
- RE: Re: Concerns on SPF Unified, Seth Goodman, 2004/09/12
- RE: Re: Concerns on SPF Unified, Scott Kitterman, 2004/09/13
- Re: Concerns on SPF Unified, Frank Ellermann, 2004/09/12
- Re: Re: Concerns on SPF Unified, Graham Murray, 2004/09/12
- Re: Concerns on SPF Unified, Frank Ellermann, 2004/09/13
- Re: Concerns on SPF Unified, Stephane Bortzmeyer, 2004/09/13
Re: Spam undetectable by SPF (domain reputation) or Bayesian (content)?,
Holm, Mark,
2004/09/10
- Re: Spam undetectable by SPF (domain reputation) or Bayesian (content)?, AccuSpam, 2004/09/10
- Re: Spam undetectable by SPF (domain reputation) or Bayesian (content)?, Jonathan Gardner, 2004/09/10
- Re: Spam undetectable by SPF (domain reputation) or Bayesian (content)?, AccuSpam, 2004/09/10
- Re: Spam undetectable by SPF (domain reputation) or Bayesian (content)?, Ralf Doeblitz, 2004/09/10
- Re: Spam undetectable by SPF (domain reputation) or Bayesian (content)?, Jonathan Gardner, 2004/09/13
- Re: Spam undetectable by SPF (domain reputation) or Bayesian (content)?, Alan Hodgson, 2004/09/13
- Re: Spam undetectable by SPF (domain reputation) or Bayesian (content)?, Jonathan Gardner, 2004/09/14
- Re: Spam undetectable by SPF (domain reputation) or Bayesian (content)?, Jonathan Gardner, 2004/09/14
- Re: Spam undetectable by SPF (domain reputation) or Bayesian (content)?, Fridrik Skulason, 2004/09/13
- Re: Spam undetectable by SPF (domain reputation) or Bayesian (content)?, David Brodbeck, 2004/09/13
- Re: Spam undetectable by SPF (domain reputation) or Bayesian (content)?, Fridrik Skulason, 2004/09/13
- Re: Spam undetectable by SPF (domain reputation) or Bayesian (content)?, Nico Kadel-Garcia, 2004/09/13
- Message not available
- Re: Spam undetectable by SPF (domain reputation) or Bayesian (content)?, Jonathan Gardner, 2004/09/13
- Re: Spam undetectable by SPF (domain reputation) or Bayesian (content)?, Paul Howarth, 2004/09/13
Unified SPF policy daemon and constructing a personal whitelist,
Meng Weng Wong,
2004/09/09
- Re: Unified SPF policy daemon and constructing a personal whitelist: bugfix, Meng Weng Wong, 2004/09/09
- agupimail: examples of various return codes, Meng Weng Wong, 2004/09/09
- Re: Unified SPF policy daemon and constructing a personal whitelist, Meng Weng Wong, 2004/09/09
- Re: Unified SPF policy daemon and constructing a personal whitelist, AccuSpam, 2004/09/09
- Re: Unified SPF policy daemon and constructing a personal whitelist, Meng Weng Wong, 2004/09/09
Seattle Perl User's Group presentation on SPF,
Jonathan Gardner,
2004/09/08
- Re: Seattle Perl User's Group presentation on SPF, mholm, 2004/09/08
- Re: Seattle Perl User's Group presentation on SPF, Jonathan Gardner, 2004/09/08
- Re: Seattle Perl User's Group presentation on SPF, Meng Weng Wong, 2004/09/09
- Re: Seattle Perl User's Group presentation on SPF, Jonathan Gardner, 2004/09/09
- Re: Seattle Perl User's Group presentation on SPF, Meng Weng Wong, 2004/09/09
- Re: Seattle Perl User's Group presentation on SPF, Steven Earl Smith, 2004/09/09
- Cloudmark calls it Microsoft's Sender ID (was Re: Seattle Perl User's Group presentation on SPF), Jonathan Gardner, 2004/09/09
- Re: Cloudmark calls it Microsoft's Sender ID (was Re: Seattle Perl User's Group presentation on SPF), Steven Earl Smith, 2004/09/09
- Wildcard DNS entry, guy, 2004/09/08
- Re: Wildcard DNS entry, Meng Weng Wong, 2004/09/08
- RE: Wildcard DNS entry, Guy, 2004/09/08
- Re: Wildcard DNS entry, Koen Martens, 2004/09/09
- Re: Wildcard DNS entry, Paul Howarth, 2004/09/09
- Wildcard DNS entry, Roger Moser, 2004/09/09
- RE: Wildcard DNS entry, guy, 2004/09/09
- Re: Wildcard DNS entry, Aredridel, 2004/09/09
- RE: Wildcard DNS entry, Guy, 2004/09/09
- RE: Wildcard DNS entry, william(at)elan.net, 2004/09/09
- RE: Wildcard DNS entry, guy, 2004/09/09
- Re: Wildcard DNS entry, Stephane Bortzmeyer, 2004/09/10
- Re: Wildcard DNS entry, Roger Moser, 2004/09/10
- Re: Re: Wildcard DNS entry, Ralf Doeblitz, 2004/09/10
- Re: Wildcard DNS entry, Roger Moser, 2004/09/10
- Wildcard DNS entry, Roger Moser, 2004/09/09
- RE: Wildcard DNS entry, guy, 2004/09/09
- Wildcard DNS entry, Roger Moser, 2004/09/09
- Re: Wildcard DNS entry, Stephane Bortzmeyer, 2004/09/10
- Re: Wildcard DNS entry, Roger Moser, 2004/09/10
- Re: Wildcard DNS entry, Stephane Bortzmeyer, 2004/09/10
- Re: Wildcard DNS entry, Roger Moser, 2004/09/10
- Re: Wildcard DNS entry, Stephane Bortzmeyer, 2004/09/10
- RE: Re: Wildcard DNS entry, guy, 2004/09/10
- Re: Wildcard DNS entry, Roger Moser, 2004/09/10
- Re: Wildcard DNS entry, David Woodhouse, 2004/09/09
- Re: Wildcard DNS entry, Koen Martens, 2004/09/09
- Re: Wildcard DNS entry, Meng Weng Wong, 2004/09/14
- Re: Wildcard DNS entry, Paul Howarth, 2004/09/15
- Re: Wildcard DNS entry, David Brodbeck, 2004/09/15
- RE: Wildcard DNS entry, guy, 2004/09/15
- RE: Wildcard DNS entry, David Woodhouse, 2004/09/15
- RE: Wildcard DNS entry, guy, 2004/09/15
- RE: Wildcard DNS entry, David Woodhouse, 2004/09/15
- Re: Wildcard DNS entry, Meng Weng Wong, 2004/09/15
- RE: Wildcard DNS entry, guy, 2004/09/15
- Wildcard DNS entry, Roger Moser, 2004/09/15
- RE: Wildcard DNS entry, Seth Goodman, 2004/09/15
- Re: Wildcard DNS entry, william(at)elan.net, 2004/09/08
- Re: Wildcard DNS entry, Koen Martens, 2004/09/09
- RE: Seattle Perl User's Group presentation on SPF, Matthew.van.Eerde, 2004/09/08
SPF validator,
Koen Martens,
2004/09/08
- Re: SPF validator, Alex van den Bogaerdt, 2004/09/08
- Re: SPF validator, Paul Bissex, 2004/09/08
- RE: SPF validator, Shoaib, 2004/09/08
- Re: SPF validator, Meng Weng Wong, 2004/09/08
- Re: SPF validator, Frank Ellermann, 2004/09/09
argh ... I wish people would RTFRFC,
Meng Weng Wong,
2004/09/07
- Re: argh ... I wish people would RTFRFC, rgreene(_at_)tclme(_dot_)org, 2004/09/07
- Re: argh ... I wish people would RTFRFC, David B. Evans, 2004/09/07
- Re: argh ... I wish people would RTFRFC, Koen Martens, 2004/09/08
- Re: argh ... I wish people would RTFRFC, Michel Bouissou, 2004/09/08
- Re: argh ... I wish people would RTFRFC, jpinkerton, 2004/09/08
- argh ... I wish people would RTFRFC, Roger Moser, 2004/09/08
- Re: argh ... I wish people would RTFRFC, Chris Haynes, 2004/09/08
- RE: argh ... I wish people would RTFRFC, Guy, 2004/09/08
- Re: argh ... I wish people would RTFRFC, Frank Ellermann, 2004/09/09
- Re: argh ... I wish people would RTFRFC, Tim Kennedy, 2004/09/08
- Re: argh ... I wish people would RTFRFC, Holm, Mark, 2004/09/08
- Re: argh ... I wish people would RTFRFC, mholm, 2004/09/08
- Re: argh ... I wish people would RTFRFC, Holm, Mark, 2004/09/09
SPF makes the BBC,
Chris Haynes,
2004/09/05
- Re: SPF makes the BBC, Peter Bowyer, 2004/09/05
- Re: SPF makes the BBC, Koen Martens, 2004/09/06
- Re: SPF makes the BBC, Graham Murray, 2004/09/06
- Re: SPF makes the BBC, Chris Haynes, 2004/09/06
- Re: SPF makes the BBC, jpinkerton, 2004/09/06
- Re: SPF makes the BBC, Peter Bowyer, 2004/09/06
- Re: SPF makes the BBC, Koen Martens, 2004/09/06
- Re: SPF makes the BBC, David Brodbeck, 2004/09/06
- Re: SPF makes the BBC, Meng Weng Wong, 2004/09/06
- RE: SPF makes the BBC, terry, 2004/09/06
- Re: SPF makes the BBC, Meng Weng Wong, 2004/09/07
- Re: SPF makes the BBC, Peter Bowyer, 2004/09/07
spfv1 and spf2/pra,
Michael Weiner,
2004/09/04
- Re: spfv1 and spf2/pra, william(at)elan.net, 2004/09/04
- RE: spfv1 and spf2/pra, terry, 2004/09/04
- DNS can re-order txt records, guy, 2004/09/06
- DNS can re-order txt records, Roger Moser, 2004/09/06
- RE: DNS can re-order txt records, guy, 2004/09/06
- Google's gmail.com checks spf records!, guy, 2004/09/06
- Re: Google's gmail.com checks spf records!, Michael Weiner, 2004/09/06
- Re: Google's gmail.com checks spf records!, jpinkerton, 2004/09/07
- Re: Google's gmail.com checks spf records!, jpinkerton, 2004/09/08
- Re: Google's gmail.com checks spf records!, Paul Howarth, 2004/09/08
- Re: Google's gmail.com checks spf records!, jpinkerton, 2004/09/08
- Re: Google's gmail.com checks spf records!, Paul Howarth, 2004/09/08
- Re: Google's gmail.com checks spf records!, jpinkerton, 2004/09/08
- Re: Google's gmail.com checks spf records!, Paul Howarth, 2004/09/08
- Re: Google's gmail.com checks spf records!, jpinkerton, 2004/09/08
- Re: Google's gmail.com checks spf records!, Paul Howarth, 2004/09/08
- Google's gmail.com checks spf records!, Roger Moser, 2004/09/08
- Re: Google's gmail.com checks spf records!, Mark, 2004/09/08
- Re: Google's gmail.com checks spf records!, jpinkerton, 2004/09/08
- Re: Re: [spf-discuss] Google's gmail.com checks spf records!, Tim Kennedy, 2004/09/08
- Re: Google's gmail.com checks spf records!, jmacdonald, 2004/09/09
- Re: Google's gmail.com checks spf records!, Koen Martens, 2004/09/08
- RE: Google's gmail.com checks spf records!, terry, 2004/09/08
- Re: Google's gmail.com checks spf records!, Stuart D. Gathman, 2004/09/08
- Re: Google's gmail.com checks spf records!, Rodolfo Sikora, 2004/09/08
- Re: Google's gmail.com checks spf records!, Mark, 2004/09/09
- RE: Google's gmail.com checks spf records!, terry, 2004/09/08
- Re: Re: [spf-discuss] Google's gmail.com checks spf records!, Tim Kennedy, 2004/09/08
- Re: spfv1 and spf2/pra, Paul Howarth, 2004/09/04
Am I interpreting the spec wrong?,
Paul Howarth,
2004/09/04
- Re: Am I interpreting the spec wrong?, Mark, 2004/09/04
- Re: Am I interpreting the spec wrong?, Koen Martens, 2004/09/04
- Re: Am I interpreting the spec wrong?, Paul Howarth, 2004/09/04
- Re: Am I interpreting the spec wrong?, Paul Howarth, 2004/09/04
- Re: Am I interpreting the spec wrong?, Mark, 2004/09/04
- Re: Am I interpreting the spec wrong?, Paul Howarth, 2004/09/04
- Re: Am I interpreting the spec wrong?, Stuart D. Gathman, 2004/09/04
- Re: Am I interpreting the spec wrong?, Paul Howarth, 2004/09/05
Apache Foundation and SenderID,
Jake S,
2004/09/02
- Re: Apache Foundation and SenderID, James Couzens, 2004/09/02
- Re: Apache Foundation and SenderID, Paul Iadonisi, 2004/09/02
- Re: Apache Foundation and SenderID, Chip Mefford, 2004/09/03
- Re: Apache Foundation and SenderID, Paul Iadonisi, 2004/09/03
- Re: Apache Foundation and SenderID, Koen Martens, 2004/09/04
- Re: Apache Foundation and SenderID, Paul Iadonisi, 2004/09/04
- Re: Apache Foundation and SenderID, Koen Martens, 2004/09/05
- RE: Apache Foundation and SenderID, terry, 2004/09/05
- Re: Apache Foundation and SenderID, Koen Martens, 2004/09/05
- Re: Apache Foundation and SenderID, jpinkerton, 2004/09/02
- Re: Apache Foundation and SenderID, Catherine Hampton, 2004/09/02
- Re: Apache Foundation and SenderID, jpinkerton, 2004/09/02
- Re: Apache Foundation and SenderID, Stuart D. Gathman, 2004/09/02
- Re: Apache Foundation and SenderID, Mark, 2004/09/02
- Re: Apache Foundation and SenderID, Marc Kool, 2004/09/02
- RE: Apache Foundation and SenderID, guy, 2004/09/02
- Re: Apache Foundation and SenderID, Jonathan Gardner, 2004/09/02
- Re: Apache Foundation and SenderID, John Keown, 2004/09/02
- Re: Apache Foundation and SenderID, Jonathan Gardner, 2004/09/03
- Re: Apache Foundation and SenderID, jpinkerton, 2004/09/03
- RE: Apache Foundation and SenderID, guy, 2004/09/03
- Re: Apache Foundation and SenderID, jpinkerton, 2004/09/03
- Re: Apache Foundation and SenderID, David Brodbeck, 2004/09/03
- RE: Apache Foundation and SenderID, Guy, 2004/09/03
- Re: Apache Foundation and SenderID, Alex van den Bogaerdt, 2004/09/03
- Re: Apache Foundation and SenderID, Ralf Doeblitz, 2004/09/04
- Re: Apache Foundation and SenderID, Alex van den Bogaerdt, 2004/09/04
- Re: Apache Foundation and SenderID, Meng Weng Wong, 2004/09/03
- Re: Apache Foundation and SenderID, AccuSpam, 2004/09/03
- neutral blacklist and rhsbl, Stuart D. Gathman, 2004/09/03
- Re: Apache Foundation and SenderID, John Hinton, 2004/09/03
- Re: Apache Foundation and SenderID, Catherine Hampton, 2004/09/02
- Re: Apache Foundation and SenderID, Alan Madill, 2004/09/02
- Re: Apache Foundation and SenderID, James Couzens, 2004/09/03
- Re: Apache Foundation and SenderID, Mike Markley, 2004/09/04
SPF Record Publishing Rate,
Holm, Mark,
2004/09/02
- RE: SPF Record Publishing Rate, Holm, Mark, 2004/09/03
- RE: SPF Record Publishing Rate, Holm, Mark, 2004/09/03
- Re: RE: SPF Record Publishing Rate, Douglas K. Fischer, 2004/09/03
- Re: RE: SPF Record Publishing Rate, Meng Weng Wong, 2004/09/03
- Re: RE: SPF Record Publishing Rate, Douglas K. Fischer, 2004/09/03
- Re: RE: SPF Record Publishing Rate, Stuart D. Gathman, 2004/09/04
- RE: RE: SPF Record Publishing Rate, terry, 2004/09/04
- Proactive checking of SPF errors? (RE: SPF Record Publishing Rate, Stephane Bortzmeyer, 2004/09/05
- SPF Record Publishing Rate, mholm, 2004/09/04
- SPF record publishing rate, Holm, Mark, 2004/09/14
Microsoft released more info Aug 30, 2004,
guy,
2004/09/01
- Re: Microsoft released more info Aug 30, 2004, jpinkerton, 2004/09/01
- Re: Microsoft released more info Aug 30, 2004, Jonathan Gardner, 2004/09/01
- Re: Microsoft released more info Aug 30, 2004, David Brodbeck, 2004/09/01
- Re: Microsoft released more info Aug 30, 2004, Lloyd Zusman, 2004/09/01
- Re: Re: Microsoft released more info Aug 30, 2004, AccuSpam, 2004/09/01
- Message not available
- Re: Re: Microsoft released more info Aug 30, 2004, AccuSpam, 2004/09/01
- Message not available
- Message not available
- Re[2]: Re: Microsoft released more info Aug 30, 2004, Chris Drake, 2004/09/01
- Re: Microsoft released more info Aug 30, 2004, jpinkerton, 2004/09/02
- RE: Microsoft released more info Aug 30, 2004, Guy, 2004/09/02
- Re: Microsoft released more info Aug 30, 2004, Koen Martens, 2004/09/02
- Re: Microsoft released more info Aug 30, 2004, Jonathan Gardner, 2004/09/02
- Re: Microsoft released more info Aug 30, 2004, Koen Martens, 2004/09/02
- Re: Microsoft released more info Aug 30, 2004, Stuart D. Gathman, 2004/09/02
- RE: Microsoft released more info Aug 30, 2004, Seth Goodman, 2004/09/02
- Re[2]: Microsoft released more info Aug 30, 2004, Bradley D. Thornton, 2004/09/02
- Re: Microsoft released more info Aug 30, 2004, Graham Murray, 2004/09/03
- RE: Microsoft released more info Aug 30, 2004, Seth Goodman, 2004/09/03
- Re: Microsoft released more info Aug 30, 2004, jpinkerton, 2004/09/03
- Re: Microsoft released more info Aug 30, 2004, David Brodbeck, 2004/09/03
- Re: Microsoft released more info Aug 30, 2004, jpinkerton, 2004/09/03
- Re: Microsoft released more info Aug 30, 2004, Philip Gladstone, 2004/09/03
- RE: Microsoft released more info Aug 30, 2004, guy, 2004/09/03
- Re: Microsoft released more info Aug 30, 2004, Koen Martens, 2004/09/03
- Re: Microsoft released more info Aug 30, 2004, Mark, 2004/09/01
- Re: Microsoft released more info Aug 30, 2004, jpinkerton, 2004/09/01
- RE: Microsoft released more info Aug 30, 2004, Ryan Malayter, 2004/09/03
Non-adoption of SPF by most-phished domains,
Paul Bissex,
2004/09/01
- Re: Non-adoption of SPF by most-phished domains, Koen Martens, 2004/09/01
- Re: Non-adoption of SPF by most-phished domains, Paul Iadonisi, 2004/09/01
- Re: Non-adoption of SPF by most-phished domains, Jonathan Gardner, 2004/09/01
- Re: Non-adoption of SPF by most-phished domains, Mark, 2004/09/01
- Non-adoption of SPF by most-phished domains, Roger Moser, 2004/09/02
- Re: Non-adoption of SPF by most-phished domains, Chip Mefford, 2004/09/02
- Re: Non-adoption of SPF by most-phished domains, Alan Hodgson, 2004/09/02
- RE: Non-adoption of SPF by most-phished domains, Scott Kitterman, 2004/09/02
- Re: Non-adoption of SPF by most-phished domains, Alan Hodgson, 2004/09/02
- RE: Non-adoption of SPF by most-phished domains, Scott Kitterman, 2004/09/02
- Re: Non-adoption of SPF by most-phished domains, AccuSpam, 2004/09/01
- RE: Non-adoption of SPF by most-phished domains, terry, 2004/09/01
- RE: Non-adoption of SPF by most-phished domains, Maxime Guillaud, 2004/09/02
- Re: Non-adoption of SPF by most-phished domains, Tim Kennedy, 2004/09/02
- Re: Non-adoption of SPF by most-phished domains, Koen Martens, 2004/09/02
- the truth (was: Re: Non-adoption of SPF by most-phished domains), Marc Kool, 2004/09/02
- Re: the truth (was: Re: [spf-discuss] Non-adoption of SPF by most-phished domains), Tim Kennedy, 2004/09/02
- Re: the truth (was: Re: [spf-discuss] Non-adoption of SPF by most-phished domains), Koen Martens, 2004/09/02
- Re: the truth (was: Re: [spf-discuss] Non-adoption of SPF by most-phished domains), Koen Martens, 2004/09/04
- Re: the truth (was: Re: Non-adoption of SPF by most-phished domains), jpinkerton, 2004/09/02
- RE: Non-adoption of SPF by most-phished domains, Ryan Malayter, 2004/09/02
- RE: Non-adoption of SPF by most-phished domains, Ryan Malayter, 2004/09/03