Carl Hutzler wrote:
And to be fair, Outlook does show both when you
OPEN THE EMAIL and read it.
In Bill Gates' dreams only. Sometimes, yes. Sometimes, no.
The "sometimes yes":
Outlook 2000:
http://home.pacbell.net/arn-py/photos/Outlook2000-1.jpg
Outlook 2003:
http://home.pacbell.net/arn-py/photos/Outlook2003-1.jpg
But there's also the "sometimes no":
First, I send myself some email. The good old fashioned way, with
telnet:
http://home.pacbell.net/arn-py/photos/telnet_25.jpg
(who needs an email client, anyway?)
Results in the "list" view, nothing surprising:
Outlook 2000:
http://home.pacbell.net/arn-py/photos/Outlook2000-2.jpg
Outlook 2003:
http://home.pacbell.net/arn-py/photos/Outlook2003-2.jpg
Now, the fun part. Open the email.
Outlook 2000:
http://home.pacbell.net/arn-py/photos/Outlook2000-3.jpg
Outlook 2003:
http://home.pacbell.net/arn-py/photos/Outlook2003-3.jpg
OOOHHH SHIIITTT !!!!!
Now, a fair warning: before anybody here posts screaming bloody murder
about how bad M$ sucks, I have more screenshots on the shelf. I showed
you this because there's nothing to show: a gorilla can do it, including
and especially the 800-pound one :-) Now, there are some people on this
very list that think their shit does not stink and their systems are
invincible (and no I do _not_ mean AOL). Beware: I have more .JPGs on
the shelf than I posted tonight; a gorilla could not do them but a
trained chimpanzee could.
In other words: I shot the darts at the easy target: M$. Don't think
that because you run *nix makes you bullet-proof. Shooting at an
elephant stuck in a hallway is no sport; I might enjoy more challenging
targets.
Michel.
