Le 04-09-22, à 17:26, Hallam-Baker, Phillip a écrit :
Did you read the BATV proposal by Dave Crocker?
<http://brandenburg.com/specifications/draft-crocker-marid-bat
v-00-06dc.html
Which has zero buy in from any party with any deployment influence.
Nope, I don't mean that proposal.
At the limit, BATV doesn't even need support from majors. It works with
the existing email system. People who implement it will immediately
benefit. No need for a "flag day" or a "critical mass".
My preference would be to have the finances managed on the IETF
model and the process managed on the OASIS model, roberts rules
of order work pretty well.
I agree that the way the MARID directorates managed the group is in
part responsible for the failure. On the other hand, I think that the
Sender-ID proposal has been critically wounded by the Microsoft patent
application, and the IETF cannot do much about it.
I remember reading that the vast majority of patents are granted. I'm
wondering if there are any legal ways of opposing to a patent before it
is accepted. Even if another group would ratify Sender-ID as a
standard, I don't see any way that it will reach critical mass with its
current IPR issues.
Regards,
GFK's
--
Guillaume Filion, ing. jr
Logidac Tech., Beaumont, Québec, Canada - http://logidac.com/
PGP Key and more: http://guillaume.filion.org/