On Thu, Sep 02, 2004 at 01:05:16PM -0700, Jonathan Gardner wrote:
On Thursday 02 September 2004 11:26 am, Koen Martens wrote:
Would an 'see, i told you so!' be too pedantic at this time? :)
No, but there's no need to say it either. I think all of us who had a lot of
hope that Meng was doing the right thing feel your wagging finger.
I don't believe Microsoft will come out the winner in the end, because we
still have SPF classic, and the prior art on that is quite clear.
A valid concern however is that classic will not validate 2822 headers,
and the status of Unified-SPF is unknown to me. I've just seen someone
on the mxcomp list suggest that Unified-SPF also uses PRA, and thus
becomes subject matter to ms.
It would be fruitfull to explore the unified landscape more I think, it
has been put in the shadow by senderid lately.
Koen
--
K.F.J. Martens, Sonologic, http://www.sonologic.nl/
Networking, embedded systems, unix expertise, artificial intelligence.
Public PGP key: http://www.metro.cx/pubkey-gmc.asc
Wondering about the funny attachment your mail program
can't read? Visit http://www.openpgp.org/