-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On Wednesday 01 September 2004 02:06 pm, jpinkerton wrote:
I believe you can now think of spf as being MS property unless you're
prepared to fight them :-(
Yes, we made a deal with the devil. They have acted in bad faith,
misrepresenting things and mudding the water. They have really caused a lot
of tempers to flare, and act innocent throughout the process. Up until
today, I thought Microsoft was really trying to be a good citizen. Now, I
join the ranks of Microsoft haters. Something stinks over there, and it
stinks very bad.
Luckily, enough of the SPF community was wise enough to stick with SPF and
so we still have a vibrant SPF classic deployment. We still have that, and
it is growing stronger exponentially.
May Microsoft RIP in the email standards world.
- --
Jonathan M. Gardner
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFBNlASBFeYcclU5Q0RAmTFAJ9YEgbEQJU6BJ8Q59t/GaJ1Xnf2pQCguuZ3
adF388Gk1mGm9p4iWDX0Oys=
=nfX1
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----