70,000 out of millions is not a de facto standard.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Jonathan Gardner" <jonagard(_at_)amazon(_dot_)com>
To: <spf-discuss(_at_)v2(_dot_)listbox(_dot_)com>
Sent: Thursday, September 02, 2004 6:27 PM
Subject: Re: [spf-discuss] Apache Foundation and SenderID
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On Thursday 02 September 2004 03:04 pm, Catherine Hampton wrote:
If anyone is interested in returning to the original SPF proposal,
pre-Microsoft, and can get a significant group to agree to support
that, I would definitely want to work with that effort.
Is 70,000 supporters enough for you? SPF Classic is already a de facto
standard. Go ahead and implement checks on it and tell your neighbors. I
think the general consensus before IETF was that no matter what the IETF
does, SPF is here to stay. The IETF was just going to rubber stamp our
standard.
- --
Jonathan M. Gardner
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFBN540BFeYcclU5Q0RAuQ4AJ47yCmoS/xoe73vuCyzRT/ZlRggSQCfQ/wH
UaEDwbJJbXI16Ldlv9UBaxI=
=0qpp
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
-------
Sender Policy Framework: http://spf.pobox.com/
Archives at http://archives.listbox.com/spf-discuss/current/
http://www.InboxEvent.com/?s=d --- Inbox Event Nov 17-19 in Atlanta features
SPF and Sender ID.
To unsubscribe, change your address, or temporarily deactivate your
subscription,
please go to
http://v2.listbox.com/member/?listname=spf-discuss(_at_)v2(_dot_)listbox(_dot_)com