spf-discuss
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: SPF-compliant phishing?

2004-09-17 20:25:36

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "David Woodhouse" <dwmw2(_at_)infradead(_dot_)org>
To: <spf-discuss(_at_)v2(_dot_)listbox(_dot_)com>
Sent: Friday, September 17, 2004 6:13 PM
Subject: Re: [spf-discuss] SPF-compliant phishing?


On Thu, 2004-09-16 at 12:45 -0700, Jonathan Gardner wrote:
We already know to throw out the SPF FAIL pile.

Until SRS is ubiquitous that's not strictly true. Throwing away the SPF
FAIL is _also_ hurting adoption. Every time someone complains that
forwarded email is bouncing, I get them to tell the _sender_ not to
publish '-all' and the _recipient_ not to obey it. It's too soon.

I would love to get SRS running myself. It's.... still pretty hairy to get
it going under sendmail.


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>