spf-discuss
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: SPF-compliant phishing?

2004-09-18 11:54:17
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----

On Fri, Sep 17, 2004 at 11:49:24AM -0400, Scott Kitterman wrote:
Yes.  Absolutely.  Problem is, how many commercial SMTP operators do that
today?  Answer near as I can tell is almost none.  More and more are doing
the authentication, but allowing clients to use non-local addresses, but
only ones that belong to them seems to be very rare.

As far as I know, the software doesn't support it.  Point me at instructions
for getting sendmail and/or postfix to do that and I will.  Granted, I'm
small potatoes, but I'll bet that's the case for a lot of others too.

- -- 
Alan Batie                   ______    alan.batie.org                Me
alan at batie.org            \    /    www.qrd.org         The Triangle
PGPFP DE 3C 29 17 C0 49 7A    \  /     www.pgpi.com   The Weird Numbers
27 40 A5 3C 37 4A DA 52 B9     \/      spamassassin.taint.org  NO SPAM!

This fall, we have the choice between a police state and a nanny state.
Both want most of our money and liberty, but the liberties one will take
are a lot more severe than the other...
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (FreeBSD)

iQCVAwUBQUyEWYv4wNua7QglAQHelAP/YpdbPE1Q16/8WGZxq/A9D09qwlH9Okvu
JW+R5P3rQgq/drQHgV1vWLv7hv5R0AXzCFiI1SBUJWYF8qQjIb2n5bK9FCV6VqoP
du7hl/Pdw2CTZCDyfxfvoeaVNJ8kVjVNOAMnQeOo1AD/Ga7JLwDpmrV9DHe/BtS6
wmyBOD8s7kg=
=gEaf
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>