On Sat, Sep 04, 2004 at 12:29:50AM -0400,
Meng Weng Wong <mengwong(_at_)dumbo(_dot_)pobox(_dot_)com> wrote
a message of 15 lines which said:
perhaps we need to specify in -protocol that "ipv4" and "ipv6" are
synonmymous with "ip4" and "ip6".
Is someone doing a sweep of existing SPF records to test them and mail
the postmaster if there is an error? An early and enthusiastic adopter
of SPF in ".fr" publishes:
nordnet.fr. 3600 IN TXT "v=spf1 mx ptr
p4:194.51.85.0/24 ip4:194.206.126.0/24 ~all"
They still have "SPF pass" because of the PTR mechanism.