RE: SPF-compliant phishing?

I guess this explains why so much software is written half-assed!

Sorry, I could not stop myself!  But I tried!  :)

Guy

Rik
-- 
"Debugging is twice as hard as writing the code in the first place.
Therefore, if you write the code as cleverly as possible, you are,
by definition, not smart enough to debug it." - Brian W. Kernighan

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
Re: SPF-compliant phishing?, (continued) Re: SPF-compliant phishing?, David Woodhouse Re: SPF-compliant phishing?, Daniel Taylor Re: SPF-compliant phishing?, David Woodhouse Re: SPF-compliant phishing?, Stuart D. Gathman Re: SPF-compliant phishing?, David Woodhouse Re: SPF-compliant phishing?, Tony Finch Re: SPF-compliant phishing?, Daniel Taylor Re: SPF-compliant phishing?, David Woodhouse Re: SPF-compliant phishing?, Rik van Riel Re: SPF-compliant phishing?, David Woodhouse RE: SPF-compliant phishing?, guy <= RE: SPF-compliant phishing?, Seth Goodman RE: SPF-compliant phishing?, Rik van Riel RE: SPF-compliant phishing?, Seth Goodman RE: SPF-compliant phishing?, Stuart D. Gathman RE: SPF-compliant phishing?, David Woodhouse RE: SPF-compliant phishing?, David Woodhouse Re: SPF-compliant phishing?, Meng Weng Wong RE: SPF-compliant phishing?, Seth Goodman Re: SPF-compliant phishing?, Stuart D. Gathman SPF-compliant phishing?, Roger Moser

Previous by Date:	RE: Wildcard DNS entry, David Woodhouse
Next by Date:	Observations on SPF record publishing in .edu, Holm, Mark
Previous by Thread:	Re: SPF-compliant phishing?, David Woodhouse
Next by Thread:	RE: SPF-compliant phishing?, Seth Goodman
Indexes:	[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]