spf-discuss
[Top] [All Lists]

RE: No use of checking RFC2822 headers

2004-09-29 07:18:27
-----Original Message-----
From: owner-spf-discuss(_at_)v2(_dot_)listbox(_dot_)com
[mailto:owner-spf-discuss(_at_)v2(_dot_)listbox(_dot_)com]On Behalf Of David 
Brodbeck
Sent: Wednesday, September 29, 2004 9:24 AM
To: spf-discuss(_at_)v2(_dot_)listbox(_dot_)com
Subject: RE: [spf-discuss] No use of checking RFC2822 headers


On Tue, 28 Sep 2004 21:49:43 -0700, Michel Py wrote
This is very good and we all thank you, but I'm afraid that
the outlook
of the Outlook situation (pun intended) is bleak. The very reason
Outlook displays the pretty name is customer request, and
delivering
to the customers what they want (no matter it's a good or bad idea)
 is what made M$ successful.

So you display both.  This is what most MTAs do.


I think that if you display both, you will find that a lot of people will only 
pay attention to the
pretty name even if the other is IN THEIR FACE.   :(

Terry Fielder
Manager Software Development and Deployment
Great Gulf Homes / Ashton Woods Homes
terry(_at_)greatgulfhomes(_dot_)com
Fax: (416) 441-9085


-------
Sender Policy Framework: http://spf.pobox.com/
Archives at http://archives.listbox.com/spf-discuss/current/
http://www.InboxEvent.com/?s=d --- Inbox Event Nov 17-19 in
Atlanta features SPF and Sender ID.
To unsubscribe, change your address, or temporarily
deactivate your subscription,
please go to
http://v2.listbox.com/member/?listname=spf-discuss(_at_)v2(_dot_)listbox(_dot_)com